These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18501874)

  • 1. Obesity does not reduce maximum acceptable weights of lift.
    Singh D; Park W; Levy MS
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18501874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB; Page GB
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials.
    Gallagher S; Hamrick CA
    Ergonomics; 1992 Sep; 35(9):1013-31. PubMed ID: 1387078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of obesity on lifting performance.
    Xu X; Mirka GA; Hsiang SM
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Jan; 39(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 17397794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Significance of biomechanical and physiological variables during the determination of maximum acceptable weight of lift.
    Jorgensen MJ; Davis KG; Kirking BC; Lewis KE; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1216-32. PubMed ID: 10503055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychophysically determined infrequent lifting capacity of Chinese participants.
    Wu SP
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):952-63. PubMed ID: 10424184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift.
    Davis KG; Jorgensen MJ; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2000 Feb; 43(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 10675055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG; Ayoub MM; Westfall PH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An isoinertial predictor for maximal acceptable lifting weights of Chinese male subjects.
    Lee YH; Chen YL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 May; 57(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 8638516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychophysically determined asymmetrical lifting capabilities for different frequencies and containers.
    Lee TH
    Ind Health; 2005 Apr; 43(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 15895850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of arborist handsaws.
    Mirka GA; Jin S; Hoyle J
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Jan; 40(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 18377869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran.
    Abadi AS; Mazlomi A; Saraji GN; Zeraati H; Hadian MR; Jafari AH
    Electron Physician; 2015 Oct; 7(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 26516443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
    Lee YH; Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Allometric scaling of uphill cycling performance.
    Jobson SA; Woodside J; Passfield L; Nevill AM
    Int J Sports Med; 2008 Sep; 29(9):753-7. PubMed ID: 18213539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting.
    Kuijer PP; van Oostrom SH; Duijzer K; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22409171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Obesity-related changes in prolonged repetitive lifting performance.
    Ghesmaty Sangachin M; Cavuoto LA
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Sep; 56():19-26. PubMed ID: 27184307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is a demanding lifting job for manual handling workers in Hong Kong?
    Yeung SS; Genaidy AM; Deddens J; Leung PC
    Ergonomics; 2003 May; 46(6):574-97. PubMed ID: 12745689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.