These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18502535)

  • 1. 'True' and 'untrue' individual recognition: suggestion of a less restrictive definition.
    Steiger S; Müller JK
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2008 Jul; 23(7):355; author reply 356. PubMed ID: 18502535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Species recognition and patterns of population variation in the reproductive structures of a damselfly genus.
    McPeek MA; Symes LB; Zong DM; McPeek CL
    Evolution; 2011 Feb; 65(2):419-28. PubMed ID: 20874736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The nose knows who's who: chemosensory individuality and mate recognition in mice.
    Brennan PA
    Horm Behav; 2004 Sep; 46(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 15325224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mate recognition by female zebra finch: analysis of individuality in male call and first investigations on female decoding process.
    Vignal C; Mathevon N; Mottin S
    Behav Processes; 2008 Feb; 77(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 17980974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex differences in face gender recognition in humans.
    Cellerino A; Borghetti D; Sartucci F
    Brain Res Bull; 2004 Jul; 63(6):443-9. PubMed ID: 15249109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining the relationships among item recognition, source recognition, and recall from an individual differences perspective.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1578-85. PubMed ID: 19857028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation.
    Svensson EI; Karlsson K; Friberg M; Eroukhmanoff F
    Curr Biol; 2007 Nov; 17(22):1943-7. PubMed ID: 17935996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection for individual recognition and the evolution of polymorphic identity signals in Polistes paper wasps.
    Sheehan MJ; Tibbetts EA
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Mar; 23(3):570-7. PubMed ID: 20074307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A potential role of male and female androgen in species recognition in a unisexual-bisexual mating complex.
    Gabor CR; Grober MS
    Horm Behav; 2010 Apr; 57(4-5):427-33. PubMed ID: 20100486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolution of intra-ejaculate sperm interactions: do sperm cooperate?
    Higginson DM; Pitnick S
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 Feb; 86(1):249-70. PubMed ID: 20608927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expression intensity, gender and facial emotion recognition: Women recognize only subtle facial emotions better than men.
    Hoffmann H; Kessler H; Eppel T; Rukavina S; Traue HC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):278-83. PubMed ID: 20728864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-modal recognition of shape from hand to eyes in human newborns.
    Streri A
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2003; 20(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12745440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender differences in brain activation during encoding and recognition of male and female faces.
    Ino T; Nakai R; Azuma T; Kimura T; Fukuyama H
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2010 Mar; 4(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 20503114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speeded old-new recognition of multidimensional perceptual stimuli: modeling performance at the individual-participant and individual-item levels.
    Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 16634673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
    McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual recognition: mice, MUPs and the MHC.
    Cotton S
    Curr Biol; 2007 Nov; 17(22):R971-3. PubMed ID: 18029254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of female choice, male-male competition, and signal transmission as causes of selection on male mating signals.
    Sullivan-Beckers L; Cocroft RB
    Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3158-71. PubMed ID: 20624180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic incompatibility drives sex allocation and maternal investment in a polymorphic finch.
    Pryke SR; Griffith SC
    Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5921):1605-7. PubMed ID: 19299618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial and behavioural measures of social discrimination by captive male zebra finches: implications of sexual and species differences for recognition research.
    Campbell DL; Hauber ME
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 19010401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.