411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18502550)
1. Background, approaches and recent trends for setting health-based occupational exposure limits: a minireview.
Nielsen GD; Ovrebø S
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Aug; 51(3):253-69. PubMed ID: 18502550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Approaches for the development of occupational exposure limits for man-made mineral fibres (MMMFs).
Ziegler-Skylakakis K
Mutat Res; 2004 Sep; 553(1-2):37-41. PubMed ID: 15288531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategy of the scientific committee on occupational exposure limits (SCOEL) in the derivation of occupational exposure limits for carcinogens and mutagens.
Bolt HM; Huici-Montagud A
Arch Toxicol; 2008 Jan; 82(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 18008062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reassessment of occupational exposure limits.
Stouten H; Ott H; Bouwman C; Wardenbach P
Am J Ind Med; 2008 Jun; 51(6):407-18. PubMed ID: 18409185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of an occupational exposure limit for n-propylbromide using benchmark dose methods.
Stelljes ME; Wood RR
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Oct; 40(2):136-50. PubMed ID: 15450717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Misinterpretation and misuse of exposure limits.
Hewett P
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Feb; 16(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 11217719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Occupational exposure limits: a comparative study.
Schenk L; Hansson SO; Rudén C; Gilek M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Mar; 50(2):261-70. PubMed ID: 18226844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evolution of industrial toxicology toward vanishing doses and the human genome].
Colombi A; Buratti M; Rubino FM; Giampiccolo R; Pulvirenti S; Brambilla G
Med Lav; 2003; 94(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 12768958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in China.
Liang Y; Wong O; Yang L; Li T; Su Z
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 16624464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of concentration-response options for diacetyl in support of occupational risk assessment.
Maier A; Kohrman-Vincent M; Parker A; Haber LT
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):285-96. PubMed ID: 20600455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simple method for quantitative risk assessment of non-threshold carcinogens based on the dose descriptor T25.
Sanner T; Dybing E; Willems MI; Kroese ED
Pharmacol Toxicol; 2001 Jun; 88(6):331-41. PubMed ID: 11453374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extensive changes to occupational exposure limits in Korea.
Jeong JY; Choi S; Kho YL; Kim PG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 20709131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Can exposure to low doses have effects?].
Apostoli P; Manno M
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2003; 25(3):310-9. PubMed ID: 14582248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative level of protection offered to workers by ACGIH threshold limit values occupational exposure limits.
Jayjock MA; Lewis PG; Lynch JR
AIHAJ; 2001; 62(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 11258867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of uncertainty factors by the SCOEL in their derivation of health-based occupational exposure limits.
Schenk L; Johanson G
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Oct; 40(9):791-8. PubMed ID: 20860525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Principles of risk assessment for determining the safety of chemicals: recent assessment of residual solvents in drugs and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
Hasegawa R; Koizumi M; Hirose A
Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2004 Jun; 44(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 15198717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A quantitative comparison of the safety margins in the european indicative occupational exposure limits and the derived no-effect levels for workers under REACH.
Schenk L; Johanson G
Toxicol Sci; 2011 Jun; 121(2):408-16. PubMed ID: 21389111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of occupational exposure limits in Japan.
Kaneko T; Wang PY; Sato A
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1998; 11(1):81-98. PubMed ID: 9637997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The significance of neurobehavioral tests for occupational exposure limits: an example from Sweden.
Edling C; Lundberg P
Neurotoxicology; 2000 Oct; 21(5):653-8. PubMed ID: 11130268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are occupational exposure limits becoming more alike within the European Union?
Schenk L; Hansson SO; Rudén C; Gilek M
J Appl Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 28(7):858-66. PubMed ID: 18381691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
