203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18502779)
1. Contrast-enhanced CT evaluation of clinically and mammographically occult multiple breast tumors in women with unilateral early breast cancer.
Taira N; Ohsumi S; Takabatake D; Hara F; Takashima S; Aogi K; Takashima S; Inoue T; Sugata S; Nishimura R
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jun; 38(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 18502779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incidental detection of clinically unexpected breast lesions by computed tomography.
Monzawa S; Washio T; Yasuoka R; Mitsuo M; Kadotani Y; Hanioka K
Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 23395815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are Mammographically Occult Additional Tumors Identified More Than 2 Cm Away From the Primary Breast Cancer on MRI Clinically Significant?
Goodman S; Mango V; Friedlander L; Desperito E; Wynn R; Ha R
Acad Radiol; 2019 Apr; 26(4):502-507. PubMed ID: 29891105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.
Prionas ND; Lindfors KK; Ray S; Huang SY; Beckett LA; Monsky WL; Boone JM
Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):714-23. PubMed ID: 20720067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) and surgical biopsy in breast cancer. Technical aspects.
De Cicco C; Pizzamiglio M; Trifirò G; Luini A; Ferrari M; Prisco G; Galimberti V; Cassano E; Viale G; Intra M; Veronesi P; Paganelli G
Q J Nucl Med; 2002 Jun; 46(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 12114878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of malignant breast lesions in the diagnostic setting with cone beam breast computed tomography (Breast CT): feasibility study.
Seifert P; Conover D; Zhang Y; Morgan R; Arieno A; Destounis S; Somerville P; Murphy PF
Breast J; 2014; 20(4):364-74. PubMed ID: 24934253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does pre-operative breast magnetic resonance imaging in addition to mammography and breast ultrasonography change the operative management of breast carcinoma?
Lim HI; Choi JH; Yang JH; Han BK; Lee JE; Lee SK; Kim WW; Kim S; Kim JS; Kim JH; Choe JH; Cho EY; Kang SS; Shin JH; Ko EY; Kim SW; Nam SJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(1):163-7. PubMed ID: 19760039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of DWI as a Rapid Unenhanced Technique for Detecting Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer in Elevated-Risk Women With Dense Breasts.
McDonald ES; Hammersley JA; Chou SH; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lee CI; Liu CL; Lehman CD; Partridge SC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):205-16. PubMed ID: 27077731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup.
Buchberger W; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Springer P; Obrist P; Dünser M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):921-7. PubMed ID: 10511149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner.
Chang CH; Nesbit DE; Fisher DR; Fritz SL; Dwyer SJ; Templeton AW; Lin F; Jewell WR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Mar; 138(3):553-8. PubMed ID: 6978009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of mammography in diagnosis of axillary abnormalities in women with normal breast examination.
Muttarak M; Chaiwun B; Peh WC
Australas Radiol; 2004 Sep; 48(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 15344978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple enhancing lesions detected on dynamic helical computed tomography-mammography.
Nishino M; Hayakawa K; Yamamoto A; Nakamura Y; Morimoto T; Mukaihara S; Urata Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2003; 27(5):771-8. PubMed ID: 14501369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefit of ultrasonography in the detection of clinically and mammographically occult breast cancer.
Chan SW; Cheung PS; Chan S; Lau SS; Wong TT; Ma M; Wong A; Law YC
World J Surg; 2008 Dec; 32(12):2593-8. PubMed ID: 17960454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography in women with axillary lymphadenopathy and normal breasts on physical examination: value in detecting occult breast carcinoma.
Leibman AJ; Kossoff MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):493-5. PubMed ID: 1503012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography-guided localization of breast lesions.
Murgo S; Wyshoff H; Faverly D; Crener K; Lenaerts L
Breast J; 2008; 14(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18248560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Localization and management of occult breast lesions.
Zola P; Volpe T; Luparia E; Rumore A; Katsaros D; Sismondi P
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1991; 12(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 2050162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience.
Jong RA; Yaffe MJ; Skarpathiotakis M; Shumak RS; Danjoux NM; Gunesekara A; Plewes DB
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):842-50. PubMed ID: 12881585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomographic mammography. Diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult carcinoma of the breast.
Sibala JL; Chang CH; Lin F; Jewell WR
Arch Surg; 1981 Jan; 116(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 6258536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
