1208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18504164)
1. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of efficacy and 3D kinematic characteristics of cervical orthoses.
Zhang S; Wortley M; Clowers K; Krusenklaus JH
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Mar; 20(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 15698698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Range-of-motion restriction and craniofacial tissue-interface pressure from four cervical collars.
Tescher AN; Rindflesch AB; Youdas JW; Jacobson TM; Downer LL; Miers AG; Basford JR; Cullinane DC; Stevens SR; Pankratz VS; Decker PA
J Trauma; 2007 Nov; 63(5):1120-6. PubMed ID: 17993960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mastication causing segmental spinal motion in common cervical orthoses.
Chin KR; Auerbach JD; Adams SB; Sodl JF; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 16481953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness of extrication collars tested during the execution of spine-board transfer techniques.
Del Rossi G; Heffernan TP; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
Spine J; 2004; 4(6):619-23. PubMed ID: 15541692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
Ivancic PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of neck movement in the soft cervical collar and rigid cervical brace in healthy subjects.
Whitcroft KL; Massouh L; Amirfeyz R; Bannister GC
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2011 Feb; 34(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 21334544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction in head and intervertebral motion provided by 7 contemporary cervical orthoses in 45 individuals.
Schneider AM; Hipp JA; Nguyen L; Reitman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):E1-6. PubMed ID: 17202874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical motion assessment using virtual reality.
Sarig-Bahat H; Weiss PL; Laufer Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19404177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neck pain assessment in a virtual environment.
Sarig-Bahat H; Weiss PL; Laufer Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):E105-12. PubMed ID: 20110842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effectiveness of various cervical orthoses. An in vivo comparison of the mechanical stability provided by several widely used models.
Sandler AJ; Dvorak J; Humke T; Grob D; Daniels W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(14):1624-9. PubMed ID: 8839463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility and validity of digital inclinometry for measuring cervical range of motion in normal subjects.
Prushansky T; Deryi O; Jabarreen B
Physiother Res Int; 2010 Mar; 15(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19554615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motion generated in the unstable cervical spine during the application and removal of cervical immobilization collars.
Prasarn ML; Conrad B; Del Rossi G; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Jun; 72(6):1609-13. PubMed ID: 22695429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of halo-vest components on stabilizing the injured cervical spine.
Ivancic PC; Beauchman NN; Tweardy L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 19139667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A method to measure cervical spine motion over extended periods of time.
Syed FI; Oza AL; Vanderby R; Heiderscheit B; Anderson PA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2092-8. PubMed ID: 17762810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standardized initial head position in cervical range-of-motion assessment: reliability and error analysis.
Solinger AB; Chen J; Lantz CA
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Jan; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 10658872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proper fitting of the cervical orthosis.
Fisher SV
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1978 Nov; 59(11):505-7. PubMed ID: 727937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of facetectomy and crosslink augmentation on motion segment flexibility in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Chutkan NB; Zhou H; Akins JP; Wenger KH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):E828-35. PubMed ID: 18923306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical spine motion in manual versus Jackson table turning methods in a cadaveric global instability model.
DiPaola MJ; DiPaola CP; Conrad BP; Horodyski M; Del Rossi G; Sawers A; Bloch D; Rechtine GR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18525488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
