BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18504512)

  • 1. Intramodal and cross-modal discrimination of curvature: Haptic touch versus vision.
    Ittyerah M; Marks LE
    Curr Psychol Lett; 2008; 24(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18504512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape.
    Norman JF; Norman HF; Clayton AM; Lianekhammy J; Zielke G
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 15129753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial anisotropy in intramodal and cross-modal judgments of stimulus orientation: the stability of the oblique effect.
    Lechelt EC; Verenka A
    Perception; 1980; 9(5):581-9. PubMed ID: 7443398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual-haptic perceptual nonequivalence for shape information and its impact upon cross-modal performance.
    Garbin CP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):547-53. PubMed ID: 2974867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning to perceive differences in solid shape through vision and touch.
    Norman JF; Clayton AM; Norman HF; Crabtree CE
    Perception; 2008; 37(2):185-96. PubMed ID: 18456923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory for curvature of objects: haptic touch vs. vision.
    Ittyerah M; Marks LE
    Br J Psychol; 2007 Nov; 98(Pt 4):589-610. PubMed ID: 17535462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-modal processing in the occipito-temporal cortex: a TMS study of the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Mancini F; Bolognini N; Bricolo E; Vallar G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 23(8):1987-97. PubMed ID: 20807050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisensory integration in the Muller-Lyer illusion: from vision to haptics.
    Mancini F; Bricolo E; Vallar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):818-30. PubMed ID: 19728224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delayed memory for visual-haptic exploration of familiar objects.
    Pensky AE; Johnson KA; Haag S; Homa D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):574-80. PubMed ID: 18567257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-modal object recognition is viewpoint-independent.
    Lacey S; Peters A; Sathian K
    PLoS One; 2007 Sep; 2(9):e890. PubMed ID: 17849019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo-haptic object representations.
    Lacey S; Pappas M; Kreps A; Lee K; Sathian K
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Sep; 198(2-3):329-37. PubMed ID: 19484467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does temporal asynchrony affect multimodal curvature detection?
    Winges SA; Eonta SE; Soechting JF
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 May; 203(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 20213147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual-haptic relations in a two-dimensional size-matching task.
    Schultz LM; Petersik JT
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Apr; 78(2):395-402. PubMed ID: 8022667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supramodality effects in visual and haptic spatial processes.
    Cattaneo Z; Vecchi T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):631-42. PubMed ID: 18444761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multisensory recognition of actively explored objects.
    Ernst MO; Newell FN
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Sep; 61(3):242-53. PubMed ID: 17974318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vision holds a greater share in visuo-haptic object recognition than touch.
    Kassuba T; Klinge C; Hölig C; Röder B; Siebner HR
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():59-68. PubMed ID: 23032487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Can touch this": Cross-modal shape categorization performance is associated with microstructural characteristics of white matter association pathways.
    Lee Masson H; Wallraven C; Petit L
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Feb; 38(2):842-854. PubMed ID: 27696592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size.
    Van Doorn GH; Richardson BL; Wuillemin DB; Symmons MA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):813-22. PubMed ID: 20348585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Visual-haptic simultaneity judgments for dynamic deformation].
    Takahashi K; Saiki J
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2008 Feb; 78(6):599-606. PubMed ID: 18402062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of temporal delay and spatial differences on cross-modal object recognition.
    Woods AT; O'Modhrain S; Newell FN
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 15460932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.