791 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18504770)
41. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Ultrasound criteria and CA 125 as predictive variables of ovarian cancer in women with adnexal tumors.
Hartman CA; Juliato CR; Sarian LO; Toledo MC; Jales RM; Morais SS; Pitta DD; Marussi EF; Derchain S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 22648861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The role of CnTI-SonoVue in the diagnosis of ovarian masses with papillary projections: a preliminary study.
Testa AC; Timmerman D; Exacoustos C; Fruscella E; Van Holsbeke C; Bokor D; Arduini D; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):512-6. PubMed ID: 17444549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular sampling: a new method for predicting ovarian cancer in vascularized complex adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Mercé LT; García Manero M
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 May; 24(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 15840800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Imaging in gynecological disease (16): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of serous cystadenofibromas in adnexa.
Virgilio BA; De Blasis I; Sladkevicius P; Moro F; Zannoni GF; Arciuolo D; Mascilini F; Ciccarone F; Timmerman D; Kaijser J; Fruscio R; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Epstein E; Leone FPG; Guerriero S; Czekierdowski A; Scambia G; Testa AC; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):823-830. PubMed ID: 30937992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [External validation of simple ultrasound rules of Timmerman on 122 ovarian tumors].
Fathallah K; Huchon C; Bats AS; Metzger U; Lefrère-Belda MA; Bensaid C; Lécuru F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Sep; 39(9):477-81. PubMed ID: 21820936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions with contrast-enhanced transvaginal ultrasonography.
Szymanski M; Socha MW; Kowalkowska ME; Zielińska IB; Eljaszewicz A; Szymanski W
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Nov; 131(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 26254725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Limitations of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography in preoperative evaluation of ovarian tumors.
Silvestre L; Martins WP; Candido-Dos-Reis FJ
J Ovarian Res; 2015 Jul; 8():47. PubMed ID: 26219956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Use of IOTA simple rules for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: meta-analysis.
Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Naftalin J; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 44(5):503-14. PubMed ID: 24920435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Contribution of power Doppler blood flow mapping to gray-scale ultrasound for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses in symptomatic and asymptomatic women.
Alcázar JL; Guerriero S; Laparte C; Ajossa S; Jurado M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Mar; 155(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 21211896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The sonographic prediction of invasive carcinoma in unilocular-solid ovarian cysts in premenopausal patients: a pilot study.
Fagotti A; Ludovisi M; De Blasis I; Virgilio B; Di Legge A; Mascilini F; Moruzzi M; Giansiracusa C; Fanfani F; Tropeano G; Di Bidino R; Scambia G; Testa A
Hum Reprod; 2012 Sep; 27(9):2676-83. PubMed ID: 22740492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Real-time ultrasound vs. evaluation of static images in the preoperative assessment of adnexal masses.
Van Holsbeke C; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Daemen A; De Moor B; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 32(6):828-31. PubMed ID: 18925606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Value of preoperative ultrasound examination in the selection of women with adnexal masses for laparoscopic surgery.
Yazbek J; Helmy S; Ben-Nagi J; Holland T; Sawyer E; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 30(6):883-8. PubMed ID: 17932999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Usefulness of color Doppler in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses].
Caruso A; Caforio L; Testa AC; Ciampelli M; Benedetti Panici P; Caruana P; Marana R; Mancuso S
Minerva Ginecol; 1998; 50(7-8):285-90. PubMed ID: 9808950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography in the presurgical characterization of adnexal masses.
Caruso A; Caforio L; Testa AC; Ciampelli M; Panici PB; Mancuso S
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Nov; 63(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 8910625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Does sphere volume affect the performance of three-dimensional power Doppler virtual vascular sampling for predicting malignancy in vascularized solid or cystic-solid adnexal masses?
Kudla MJ; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):602-8. PubMed ID: 20183808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Limited contribution of Doppler velocimetry to the differential diagnosis of extrauterine pelvic tumors.
Valentin L; Sladkevicius P; Marsàl K
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Mar; 83(3):425-33. PubMed ID: 8127537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Prediction of benignity of solid adnexal masses.
Wang S; Johnson S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):721-6. PubMed ID: 21858439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Color Doppler energy prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using logistic regression models.
Marret H; Ecochard R; Giraudeau B; Golfier F; Raudrant D; Lansac J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 12493050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional power-Doppler imaging in complex adnexal masses for the prediction of ovarian cancer.
Alcázar JL; Castillo G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):807-12. PubMed ID: 15746675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
