161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18505203)
1. Antimicrobial use through feed, water, and injection in 20 swine farms in Alberta and Saskatchewan.
Rosengren LB; Waldner CL; Reid-Smith RJ; Harding JC; Gow SP; Wilkins WL
Can J Vet Res; 2008; 72(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 18505203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survey of quantitative antimicrobial consumption in two different pig finishing systems.
Moreno MA
Vet Rec; 2012 Sep; 171(13):325. PubMed ID: 22915683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reported antibiotic use in 90 swine farms in Alberta.
Rajić A; Reid-Smith R; Deckert AE; Dewey CE; McEwen SA
Can Vet J; 2006 May; 47(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 16734370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Associations among antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella spp. isolates from 60 Alberta finishing swine farms.
Varga C; Rajić A; McFall ME; Reid-Smith RJ; McEwen SA
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2009; 6(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 18991537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antimicrobial use in the Alberta sheep industry.
Avery BP; Rajić A; McFall M; Reid-Smith RJ; Deckert AE; Irwin RJ; McEwen SA
Can J Vet Res; 2008; 72(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 18505202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS) Farm Program: results from finisher pig surveillance.
Deckert A; Gow S; Rosengren L; Léger D; Avery B; Daignault D; Dutil L; Reid-Smith R; Irwin R
Zoonoses Public Health; 2010 Nov; 57 Suppl 1():71-84. PubMed ID: 21083820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The antimicrobial resistome in relation to antimicrobial use and biosecurity in pig farming, a metagenome-wide association study in nine European countries.
Van Gompel L; Luiken REC; Sarrazin S; Munk P; Knudsen BE; Hansen RB; Bossers A; Aarestrup FM; Dewulf J; Wagenaar JA; Mevius DJ; Schmitt H; Heederik DJJ; Dorado-García A; Smit LAM;
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2019 Apr; 74(4):865-876. PubMed ID: 30649386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli isolated from grow-finish pigs in 20 herds in Alberta and Saskatchewan.
Rosengren LB; Waldner CL; Reid-Smith RJ; Checkley SL; McFall ME; Rajić A
Can J Vet Res; 2008; 72(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 18505205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative and qualitative antimicrobial usage patterns in farrow-to-finish pig herds in Belgium, France, Germany and Sweden.
Sjölund M; Postma M; Collineau L; Lösken S; Backhans A; Belloc C; Emanuelson U; Beilage EG; Stärk K; Dewulf J;
Prev Vet Med; 2016 Aug; 130():41-50. PubMed ID: 27435645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Tylosin Administration Routes on the Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Among Fecal Enterococci of Finishing Swine.
Wu F; Tokach MD; DeRouchey JM; Dritz SS; Woodworth JC; Goodband RD; Chitakasempornkul K; Bello NM; Capps K; Remfry S; Scott HM; Nagaraja TG; Apley MD; Amachawadi RG
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2019 May; 16(5):309-316. PubMed ID: 30676777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antimicrobial prescription data in Danish national database validated against treatment records in organic pig farms and analysed for associations with lesions found at slaughter.
Kruse AB; Kristensen CS; Lavlund U; Stege H
BMC Vet Res; 2019 Jun; 15(1):218. PubMed ID: 31248411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relation between technical farm performance and antimicrobial use of broiler farms.
Roskam JL; Oude Lansink AGJM; Saatkamp HW
Poult Sci; 2020 Mar; 99(3):1349-1356. PubMed ID: 32115024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting effects of changed antimicrobial usage on the abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes in finisher' gut microbiomes.
Andersen VD; Aarestrup FM; Munk P; Jensen MS; de Knegt LV; Bortolaia V; Knudsen BE; Lukjancenko O; Birkegård AC; Vigre H
Prev Vet Med; 2020 Jan; 174():104853. PubMed ID: 31783288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antibiotic use in swine farms in Alberta.
Wallinga D; Mellon M; Roach S
Can Vet J; 2006 Dec; 47(12):1153; author reply 1153-4. PubMed ID: 17217082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the risk factors for shedding Salmonella with or without antimicrobial resistance in swine using multinomial regression method.
Farzan A; Friendship RM; Dewey CE; Poppe C; Funk J
Zoonoses Public Health; 2010 Nov; 57 Suppl 1():85-93. PubMed ID: 21083821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Farm-level risk factors for the presence of Salmonella in 89 Alberta swine-finishing barns.
Rajić A; O'Connor BP; Deckert AE; Keenliside J; McFall ME; Reid-Smith RJ; Dewey CE; McEwen SA
Can J Vet Res; 2007 Oct; 71(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 17955900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Herd-specific interventions to reduce antimicrobial usage in pig production without jeopardising technical and economic performance.
Collineau L; Rojo-Gimeno C; Léger A; Backhans A; Loesken S; Nielsen EO; Postma M; Emanuelson U; Beilage EG; Sjölund M; Wauters E; Stärk KDC; Dewulf J; Belloc C; Krebs S
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Sep; 144():167-178. PubMed ID: 28716198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The quantitative effect of antimicrobial usage in Danish pig farms on the abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes in slaughter pigs.
Andersen VD; Møller FD; Jensen MS; Aarestrup FM; Vigre H
Prev Vet Med; 2023 May; 214():105899. PubMed ID: 36940534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms.
Varga C; Rajić A; McFall ME; Reid-Smith RJ; Deckert AE; Checkley SL; McEwen SA
Prev Vet Med; 2009 Mar; 88(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 19041147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing Antimicrobial Usage in Pig Production without Jeopardizing Production Parameters.
Postma M; Vanderhaeghen W; Sarrazin S; Maes D; Dewulf J
Zoonoses Public Health; 2017 Feb; 64(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 27362766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]