These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18505225)

  • 1. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Marques MM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of glazed and polished ceramics on human enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Matson E; Marques MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):547-8. PubMed ID: 17165291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing dental porcelain.
    Clelland NL; Agarwala V; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 14508738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Round robin test: wear of nine dental restorative materials in six different wear simulators - supplement to the round robin test of 2005.
    Heintze SD; Barkmeier WW; Latta MA; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):e1-9. PubMed ID: 20888629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enamel wear of modified porcelains.
    Imai Y; Suzuki S; Fukushima S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 11764126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wear of enamel opposing low-fusing and conventional ceramic restorative materials.
    Clelland NL; Agarwala V; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Mar; 10(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11406790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives.
    Suzuki S; Nagai E; Taira Y; Minesaki Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 12447221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wear evaluation of MZ100 compared to ceramic CAD/CAM materials.
    Kunzelmann KH; Jelen B; Mehl A; Hickel R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Jul; 4(3):171-84. PubMed ID: 11862884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Cavalleri A; Ferracane J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wear performance of substructure ceramics and veneering porcelains.
    Preis V; Behr M; Kolbeck C; Hahnel S; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):796-804. PubMed ID: 21524788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.
    Shabanian M; Richards LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of wear: enamel opposing three ceramic materials and a gold alloy.
    Ramp MH; Suzuki S; Cox CF; Lacefield WR; Koth DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 May; 77(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 9151273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of human enamel wear against four dental ceramics and gold.
    al-Hiyasat AS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Gilmour WH
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):487-95. PubMed ID: 9699442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of professional prophylaxis on reducing discoloration of different aesthetic restorative materials.
    Samra AP; Ribeiro DG; Borges CP; Kossatz S
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e71-6. PubMed ID: 22713738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold.
    Elmaria A; Goldstein G; Vijayaraghavan T; Legeros RZ; Hittelman EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 17098498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators--results of a round robin test.
    Heintze SD; Zappini G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):304-17. PubMed ID: 15766577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wear testing of composite, gold, porcelain, and enamel opposing a removable cobalt-chromium partial denture alloy.
    Alarcon JV; Engelmeier RL; Powers JM; Triolo PT
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 19374708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.