These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18505225)

  • 21. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials and on enamel restored with these materials.
    Francisconi LF; Honório HM; Rios D; Magalhães AC; Machado MA; Buzalaf MA
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18435196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vivo wear of enamel by a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic used for posterior fixed partial dentures: first-year results.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Young H; Jones J; Yang M; Anusavice KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 16900824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Erosion and abrasion of tooth-colored restorative materials and human enamel.
    Yu H; Wegehaupt FJ; Wiegand A; Roos M; Attin T; Buchalla W
    J Dent; 2009 Dec; 37(12):913-22. PubMed ID: 19674824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differential wear of teeth and restorative materials: clinical implications.
    Yip KH; Smales RJ; Kaidonis JA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 15237885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reduced wear of enamel with novel fine and nano-scale leucite glass-ceramics.
    Theocharopoulos A; Chen X; Hill R; Cattell MJ
    J Dent; 2013 Jun; 41(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 23438418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attritional wear and abrasive surface alterations of composite resin materials in vitro.
    Göhring TN; Besek MJ; Schmidlin PR
    J Dent; 2002; 30(2-3):119-27. PubMed ID: 12381412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wear of enamel and veneering ceramics after laboratory and chairside finishing procedures.
    Magne P; Oh WS; Pintado MR; DeLong R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Dec; 82(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 10588803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Wear behavior of human enamel against lithium disilicate glass ceramic and type III gold.
    Lee A; Swain M; He L; Lyons K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1399-405. PubMed ID: 25311791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Wear of ceramic and antagonist--a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):433-49. PubMed ID: 17720238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material.
    Guzman AF; Moore BK; Andres CJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9495160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ceramic (Feldspathic & IPS Empress II) vs. laboratory composite (Gradia) veneers; a comparison between their shear bond strength to enamel; an in vitro study.
    Nikzad S; Azari A; Dehgan S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 20085614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
    Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment, polishing and glazing.
    Lawson NC; Janyavula S; Syklawer S; McLaren EA; Burgess JO
    J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1586-91. PubMed ID: 25257823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists.
    Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Trottmann A; Schmutz F; Roos M; Hämmerle C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 23684283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Wear of enamel cusps opposed by posterior composite resin.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):885-90. PubMed ID: 20830885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains.
    Kim MJ; Oh SH; Kim JH; Ju SW; Seo DG; Jun SH; Ahn JS; Ryu JJ
    J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):979-88. PubMed ID: 22892464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.