These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18505525)
1. Assessment of Efficiency of Repellent Formulations with N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide in Laboratory Conditions. Milutinović R; Vuleta G; Milić J; Stajković N Int J Cosmet Sci; 1999 Feb; 21(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18505525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduced transdermal absorption of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide from a new topical insect repellent formulation. Qiu H; Jun HW; Dzimianski M; McCall J Pharm Dev Technol; 1997 Feb; 2(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 9552429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Insect repellent formulations of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (deet) in a liposphere system: efficacy and skin uptake. Domb AJ; Marlinsky A; Maniar M; Teomim L J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1995 Mar; 11(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 7616186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repellency of Cinnamomum cassia bark compounds and cream containing cassia oil to Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) under laboratory and indoor conditions. Chang KS; Tak JH; Kim SI; Lee WJ; Ahn YJ Pest Manag Sci; 2006 Nov; 62(11):1032-8. PubMed ID: 16894642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laboratory & field evaluation of controlled release formulation of the insect repellents N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) & N,N-diethyl phenylacetamide (DEPA) against mosquito vectors. Sadanandane C; Mathew N; Jambulingam P; Kalyanasundaram M Indian J Med Res; 2001 Mar; 113():108-12. PubMed ID: 11525153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microencapsulation decreases the skin absorption of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET). Kasting GB; Bhatt VD; Speaker TJ Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Mar; 22(2):548-52. PubMed ID: 18093794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro evaluation of concurrent use of commercially available insect repellent and sunscreen preparations. Gu X; Wang T; Collins DM; Kasichayanula S; Burczynski FJ Br J Dermatol; 2005 Jun; 152(6):1263-7. PubMed ID: 15948991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of controlled-release mosquito repellent formulations. Rutledge LC; Gupta RK; Mehr ZA; Buescher MD; Reifenrath WG J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1996 Mar; 12(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 8723256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of skin abrasions on the efficacy of the repellent deet against Aedes aegypti. Rueda LM; Rutledge LC; Gupta RK J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1998 Jun; 14(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 9673919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repellency of aromatic medicinal plant extracts and a steam distillate to Aedes aegypti. Yang YC; Lee EH; Lee HS; Lee DK; Ahn YJ J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2004 Jun; 20(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 15264623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repellency of two controlled-release formulations of deet against Anopheles quadrimaculatus and Aedes taeniorhynchus mosquitoes. Schreck CE; Kline DL J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1989 Mar; 5(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 2708995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of GC-MS and MOSES II, a hybrid modular sensor system, for the quantitative detection of the evaporation of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide from two different matrices. Schepper K; Ulmer H; Göpel W; Daniels R Pharmazie; 2000 Feb; 55(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 10723766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insect repellents and sunscreen: implications for personal protection strategies against mosquito-borne disease. Webb CE; Russell RC Aust N Z J Public Health; 2009 Oct; 33(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 19811489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pharmacokinetic assessment of the dermal absorption of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in cattle. Taylor WG; Danielson TJ; Spooner RW; Golsteyn LR Drug Metab Dispos; 1994; 22(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 8149868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biodegradation of the insecticide N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide by fungi: identification and toxicity of metabolites. Seo J; Lee YG; Kim SD; Cha CJ; Ahn JH; Hur HG Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2005 Apr; 48(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 15750774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Field efficacy of four insect repellent products against vector mosquitoes in a tropical environment. Yap HH; Jahangir K; Zairi J J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2000 Sep; 16(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 11081653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaporation and skin penetration characteristics of mosquito repellent formulations. Reifenrath WG; Hawkins GS; Kurtz MS J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1989 Mar; 5(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2565367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dermal absorption of the insect repellent DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide) in rats and monkeys: effect of anatomical site and multiple exposure. Moody RP; Benoit FM; Riedel D; Ritter L J Toxicol Environ Health; 1989; 26(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 2921778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laboratory evaluation of controlled-release insect repellent formulations. Mehr ZA; Rutledge LC; Morales EL; Meixsell VE; Korte DW J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1985 Jun; 1(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 3880224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. Fradin MS; Day JF N Engl J Med; 2002 Jul; 347(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12097535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]