These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18505665)

  • 1. A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization strategies and stimulated intrauterine insemination in a Canadian health economic model.
    Bhatt T; Baibergenova A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 May; 30(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 18505665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
    Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; Bensdorp AJ; Bossuyt PM; Koks C; Oosterhuis GJ; Hoek A; Hompes P; Broekmans FJ; Verhoeve HR; de Bruin JP; van Golde R; Repping S; Cohlen BJ; Lambers MD; van Bommel PF; Slappendel E; Perquin D; Smeenk J; Pelinck MJ; Gianotten J; Hoozemans DA; Maas JW; Groen H; Eijkemans MJ; van der Veen F; Mol BW; van Wely M
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2331-9. PubMed ID: 26269539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios.
    Groen H; Tonch N; Simons AH; van der Veen F; Hoek A; Land JA
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3236-46. PubMed ID: 24166594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of embryo transfer strategies: a decision analytic model using long-term costs and consequences of singletons and multiples born as a consequence of IVF.
    van Heesch MM; van Asselt AD; Evers JL; van der Hoeven MA; Dumoulin JC; van Beijsterveldt CE; Bonsel GJ; Dykgraaf RH; van Goudoever JB; Koopman-Esseboom C; Nelen WL; Steiner K; Tamminga P; Tonch N; Torrance HL; Dirksen CD
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2527-2540. PubMed ID: 27907897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lukassen HG; Braat DD; Wetzels AM; Zielhuis GA; Adang EM; Scheenjes E; Kremer JA
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Mar; 20(3):702-8. PubMed ID: 15618254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of primary offer of IVF vs. primary offer of IUI followed by IVF (for IUI failures) in couples with unexplained or mild male factor subfertility.
    Pashayan N; Lyratzopoulos G; Mathur R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Jun; 6():80. PubMed ID: 16796733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Kjellberg AT; Carlsson P; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Jan; 21(1):210-6. PubMed ID: 16172148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF.
    Fiddelers AA; Severens JL; Dirksen CD; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod Update; 2007; 13(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17099208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of seven IVF strategies: results of a Markov decision-analytic model.
    Fiddelers AA; Dirksen CD; Dumoulin JC; van Montfoort AP; Land JA; Janssen JM; Evers JL; Severens JL
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1648-55. PubMed ID: 19318703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI.
    Veleva Z; Karinen P; Tomás C; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1632-9. PubMed ID: 19318704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles.
    Gerris J; De Sutter P; De Neubourg D; Van Royen E; Vander Elst J; Mangelschots K; Vercruyssen M; Kok P; Elseviers M; Annemans L; Pauwels P; Dhont M
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 14990547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of single versus double embryo transfer in IVF in relation to female age.
    van Loendersloot LL; Moolenaar LM; van Wely M; Repping S; Bossuyt PM; Hompes PGA; van der Veen F; Mol BWJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jul; 214():25-30. PubMed ID: 28460276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint.
    Polinder S; Heijnen EM; Macklon NS; Habbema JD; Fauser BJ; Eijkemans MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Feb; 23(2):316-23. PubMed ID: 18033807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of different embryo transfer strategies in England.
    Dixon S; Faghih Nasiri F; Ledger WL; Lenton EA; Duenas A; Sutcliffe P; Chilcott JB
    BJOG; 2008 May; 115(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 18355368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost Implications for Subsequent Perinatal Outcomes After IVF Stratified by Number of Embryos Transferred: A Five Year Analysis of Vermont Data.
    Carpinello OJ; Casson PR; Kuo CL; Raj RS; Sills ES; Jones CA
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 14(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 26969653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Economic evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer with subsequent single frozen embryo transfer in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program.
    Hernandez Torres E; Navarro-Espigares JL; Clavero A; López-Regalado M; Camacho-Ballesta JA; Onieva-García M; Martínez L; Castilla JA
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Mar; 103(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 25557244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Universal coverage of IVF pays off.
    Vélez MP; Connolly MP; Kadoch IJ; Phillips S; Bissonnette F
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1313-9. PubMed ID: 24706002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimising twins in in vitro fertilisation: a modelling study assessing the costs, consequences and cost-utility of elective single versus double embryo transfer over a 20-year time horizon.
    Scotland GS; McLernon D; Kurinczuk JJ; McNamee P; Harrild K; Lyall H; Rajkhowa M; Hamilton M; Bhattacharya S
    BJOG; 2011 Aug; 118(9):1073-83. PubMed ID: 21477172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial.
    Fiddelers AA; van Montfoort AP; Dirksen CD; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Dunselman GA; Janssen JM; Severens JL; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2090-7. PubMed ID: 16613886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis.
    van Rumste MM; Custers IM; van Wely M; Koks CA; van Weering HG; Beckers NG; Scheffer GJ; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Mochtar MH; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 24456703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.