These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18506178)

  • 1. Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake.
    Fitzpatrick P; Winston A; Mooney T
    Br J Cancer; 2008 Jun; 98(11):1759-61. PubMed ID: 18506178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of Australian clients towards male radiographers working in breast imaging: Quantitative results from a pilot study.
    Warren-Forward HM; Mackie B; Alchin M; Mooney T; Fitzpatrick P
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Feb; 23(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 28290337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of individual radiographers on rates of attendance to breast screening: a 7-year retrospective study.
    Savaridas SL; Brook J; Codde JP; Bulsara M; Wylie E
    Clin Radiol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):413.e7-413.e13. PubMed ID: 29273227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
    Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance.
    Brett J; Austoker J
    J Public Health Med; 2001 Dec; 23(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 11873891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography.
    Van Goethem M; Mortelmans D; Bruyninckx E; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Van Hove E; De Schepper A
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2384-9. PubMed ID: 14534806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of the National Breast Screening Programme in Ireland: Two-year interval analysis (2004-2013) of BreastCheck.
    Fitzpatrick PE; Greehy G; Mooney MT; Flanagan F; Larke A; Connors A; O'Doherty A
    J Med Screen; 2018 Dec; 25(4):191-196. PubMed ID: 29153014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intervention trial of previous nonattender invitation for breast screening.
    Fleming P; Mooney T; Wilson L; Fitzpatrick P
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2016 Nov; 25(6):533-7. PubMed ID: 26642321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptions and experiences that may influence consideration of breast imaging as a career option.
    Taylor K; Orlowski L; Strudwick R
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 May; 25(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 30955685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting reattendance to the second round of the Maltese national breast screening programme: an analytical descriptive study.
    Marmarà D; Marmarà V; Hubbard G
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):189. PubMed ID: 30760275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An assessment of the potential impact of the introduction of male mammographers into the National Health Service breast screening programme.
    Haddock G; Harcombe J; Jenkins J; Mackie A; Witney C
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):e251-e257. PubMed ID: 32331927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women's perceptions of screening mammography.
    Irwig L; Cockburn J; Turnbull D; Simpson JM; Mock P; Tattersall M
    Aust J Public Health; 1991 Mar; 15(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 2025671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interval cancer rates in the Irish national breast screening programme.
    O'Brien KM; Dwane F; Kelleher T; Sharp L; Comber H
    J Med Screen; 2015 Sep; 22(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 25917389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adherence to screening mammography recommendations in a university general medicine clinic.
    Dolan NC; Reifler DR; McDermott MM; McGaghie WC
    J Gen Intern Med; 1995 Jun; 10(6):299-306. PubMed ID: 7562120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-observer variability in mammography screening and effect of type and number of readers on screening outcome.
    Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Groenewoud JH; van de Poll-Franse LV; Fracheboud J; Coebergh JW
    Br J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 100(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 19259088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Women's views of the Scottish Breast Screening Programme: a national consumer opinion survey.
    Roworth MA; McIlwaine GM; Wallace AM
    Public Health; 1993 May; 107(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 8511238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive and affective correlates of decisional balance regarding screening mammography in older women.
    Phillips CA; Green HJ; Morrissey SA
    Psychol Health Med; 2012; 17(2):164-75. PubMed ID: 21780961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment.
    Brett J; Austoker J; Ong G
    J Public Health Med; 1998 Dec; 20(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 9923945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast Cancer Knowledge and Screening Practice and Barriers Among Women in Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
    Al-Zalabani AH; Alharbi KD; Fallatah NI; Alqabshawi RI; Al-Zalabani AA; Alghamdi SM
    J Cancer Educ; 2018 Feb; 33(1):201-207. PubMed ID: 27271153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography perceptions and practices among women aged 30-49: The role of screening programme availability and cultural affiliation.
    Labrie NHM; Ludolph RA; Schulz PJ
    Patient Educ Couns; 2020 Feb; 103(2):369-375. PubMed ID: 31506173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.