These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18506382)

  • 1. Incontinence pads: recommending the best product-based wetback performance and price.
    Erekson EA; Meyer SA; Melick C; McLennan MT
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1411-4. PubMed ID: 18506382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Cost Analysis of Icon Reusable Underwear Versus Disposable Pads for Mild to Moderate Urinary Incontinence.
    Alam PA; Huang JC; Clark BA; Burkett LS; Richter LA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Sep; 26(9):575-579. PubMed ID: 30001254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simulation comparing the cost-effectiveness of adult incontinence products.
    Yamasato K; Kaneshiro B; Oyama IA
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 24949834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the performance of small incontinence pads: a study of "wet comfort".
    Thornburn P; Fader M; Dean G; Brooks R; Cottenden A
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1997 Jul; 24(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 9274279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized Cross-over Comparison of Icon™ Reusable Underwear to Disposable Pads for the Management of Mild to Moderate Urinary Incontinence.
    Alam PA; Burkett LS; Clark BA; White NC; Tefera EA; Richter LA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 29474291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An engineering challenge: incontinence.
    Farmer M
    Med Device Technol; 1996 Mar; 7(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 10159869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Absorbent products for urinary incontinence management].
    Miget G; Moutounaick M; Kervinio F; Teng M; Chesnel C; Charlanes A; Le Breton F; Amarenco G
    Prog Urol; 2018 Dec; 28(17):953-961. PubMed ID: 30361139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use and costs of incontinence pads in female study volunteers. Continence Program for Women Research Group.
    McClish DK; Wyman JF; Sale PG; Camp J; Earle B
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1999 Jul; 26(4):207-8, 210-3. PubMed ID: 10476176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absorbent products for moderate-heavy urinary and/or faecal incontinence in women and men.
    Fader M; Cottenden AM; Getliffe K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Oct; (4):CD007408. PubMed ID: 18843748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting the leakage performance of small bodyworn disposable incontinence pads using laboratory tests.
    Cottenden AM; Dean GE; Brooks RJ
    Med Eng Phys; 1997 Sep; 19(6):556-71. PubMed ID: 9394904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continence. Pad use in perspective.
    McKibben E
    Nurs Times; 1995 Jun 14-20; 91(24):60-2. PubMed ID: 7617488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of current technologies for urinary incontinence: strengths and limitations.
    Fader M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 12885193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cost-effectiveness study of the management of intractable urinary incontinence by urinary catheterisation or incontinence pads.
    McMurdo ME; Davey PG; Elder MA; Miller RM; Old DC; Malek M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Jun; 46(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 1645076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pad test by mail for home evaluation of urinary incontinence.
    Flisser AJ; Figueroa J; Bleustein CB; Panagopoulos G; Blaivas JG
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 14983423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Urinary incontinence: a vibration alert system for detecting pad overflow.
    Fernandes B; Gaydecki P; Jowitt F; van den Heuvel E
    Assist Technol; 2011; 23(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 22256670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multicenter comparative evaluation: disposable pads for women with light incontinence.
    Clarke-O'Neill S; Pettersson L; Fader M; Cottenden A; Brooks R
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2004; 31(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 15128093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of all-in-one incontinence pads.
    Pettersson L; Fader M
    Nurs Times; 2000 Feb; 96(6 Suppl):suppl 11. PubMed ID: 11962064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Absorbent products for light urinary incontinence in women.
    Fader M; Cottenden AM; Getliffe K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; 2007(2):CD001406. PubMed ID: 17443507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Use of devices for urinary incontinence among the elderly of the basic health area of Cabra (Córdoba)].
    Gavira Iglesias FJ; Caridad y Ocerín JM; Pérez del Molino Martín J; Valderrama Gama E; López Pérez M; Romero López M; Pavón Aranguren MV; Guerrero Muñoz JB
    Aten Primaria; 2000 May; 25(8):556-9. PubMed ID: 10876949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: a comparison of the cost of conservative versus surgical management.
    Brown JA; Elliott DS; Barrett DM
    Urology; 1998 May; 51(5):715-20. PubMed ID: 9610584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.