These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18507560)
1. Current of injury (COI) pattern recorded from catheter delivered active fixation pacing leads. van Gelder BM; Bracke FA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):786-7; author reply 787. PubMed ID: 18507560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Current of injury predicts acute performance of catheter-delivered active fixation pacing leads. Redfearn DP; Gula LJ; Krahn AD; Skanes AC; Klein GJ; Yee R Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Dec; 30(12):1438-44. PubMed ID: 18070296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current of injury predicts adequate active lead fixation in permanent pacemaker/defibrillation leads. Saxonhouse SJ; Conti JB; Curtis AB J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Feb; 45(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 15680721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Active-fixation, steroid-eluting ventricular leads: the medium-term results in children. Ayabakan C; Celiker A; Karagöz T; Ozer S; Ozme S Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2005 Dec; 5(4):278-82. PubMed ID: 16330392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Left ventricular "temporary pacemaker wire": a viable option in emergency situation. Ali F; Mohamad T; Elder M; Jacob S; Gardi DO Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Mar; 27(3):374.e1-374.e2. PubMed ID: 19328400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence and predictors of pacemaker reprogramming: potential consequences for remote follow-up. Udo EO; van Hemel NM; Zuithoff NP; Barrett MJ; Ruiter JH; Doevendans PA; Moons KG Europace; 2013 Jul; 15(7):978-83. PubMed ID: 23419656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variation in pacing impedance: impact of implant site and measurement method. Anderson SE; Skadsberg ND; Laske TG; Benditt DG; Iaizzo PA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Sep; 30(9):1076-82. PubMed ID: 17725749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Twiddler's syndrome: an unusual cause of pacemaker malfunction. Young KR; Bailey WM J La State Med Soc; 2002; 154(3):152-3. PubMed ID: 12139362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple bioelectric impedance vectors in the monitoring of congestive heart failure. Madias JE J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jan; 55(3):259; author reply 259. PubMed ID: 20117411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of pacing/defibrillator lead failure using device diagnostics and pacing maneuvers. Chung EH; Casavant D; John RM Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Apr; 32(4):547-9. PubMed ID: 19335868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay]. Salerno-Uriarte JA; Tritto M Ital Heart J Suppl; 2001 Aug; 2(8):912-4. PubMed ID: 11582726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Successful implant of a leadless pacemaker with tine-based fixation next to an abandoned battery-depleted screw-in helix fixation leadless device. Jung W; Sadeghzadeh G; Jäckle S; Roggenbuck-Schwilk B; Zvereva V; Kohler J Europace; 2018 Mar; 20(3):500. PubMed ID: 29016827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Current trends in cardiac pacing technology. I. Bradycardia pacing. Schroeppel EA Biomed Sci Technol; 1992 Jul; 1(3):90-102. PubMed ID: 10149865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]