161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18507585)
1. Economic implications of home births and birth centers: a structured review.
Henderson J; Petrou S
Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 18507585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Costing Alternative Birth Settings for Women at Low Risk of Complications: A Systematic Review.
Scarf V; Catling C; Viney R; Homer C
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149463. PubMed ID: 26891444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost analysis of the Dutch obstetric system: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth--a prospective non-randomised controlled study.
Hendrix MJ; Evers SM; Basten MC; Nijhuis JG; Severens JL
BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Nov; 9():211. PubMed ID: 19925673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The opportunity costs of birth in Australia: Hospital resource savings for a post-COVID-19 era.
Callander EJ; Bull C; McInnes R; Toohill J
Birth; 2021 Jun; 48(2):274-282. PubMed ID: 33580537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in facility-based childbirth and barriers to care at a birth center and community hospital in rural Chiapas, Mexico: A mixed-methods study.
Truong S; Montaño M; Sullivan MM; Macias V; Flores H; Mata H; Molina RL
Midwifery; 2023 Jan; 116():103507. PubMed ID: 36288677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Where do poor women in developing countries give birth? A multi-country analysis of demographic and health survey data.
Montagu D; Yamey G; Visconti A; Harding A; Yoong J
PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e17155. PubMed ID: 21386886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
Kataoka Y; Eto H; Iida M
Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends and state variations in out-of-hospital births in the United States, 2004-2017.
MacDorman MF; Declercq E
Birth; 2019 Jun; 46(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 30537156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experiences of women who have planned unassisted home births in high-resource countries: a qualitative systematic review.
Macdonald D; Helwig M; Snelgrove-Clarke E
JBI Evid Synth; 2023 Sep; 21(9):1732-1763. PubMed ID: 37114867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How do pregnancy and birth experiences influence planned place of birth in future pregnancies? Findings from a longitudinal, narrative study.
Coxon K; Sandall J; Fulop NJ
Birth; 2015 Jun; 42(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 25676885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Scarf VL; Rossiter C; Vedam S; Dahlen HG; Ellwood D; Forster D; Foureur MJ; McLachlan H; Oats J; Sibbritt D; Thornton C; Homer CSE
Midwifery; 2018 Jul; 62():240-255. PubMed ID: 29727829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic analysis of two models of low-risk maternity care: a freestanding birth center compared to traditional care.
Stone PW; Zwanziger J; Hinton Walker P; Buenting J
Res Nurs Health; 2000 Aug; 23(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10940953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Home and Birth Center Birth in the United States: Time for Greater Collaboration Across Models of Care.
Caughey AB; Cheyney M
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 133(5):1033-1050. PubMed ID: 31022111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in woman at low risk of complications: evidence from the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.
Schroeder E; Petrou S; Patel N; Hollowell J; Puddicombe D; Redshaw M; Brocklehurst P;
BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2292. PubMed ID: 22517916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a 'best fit' framework approach.
Coxon K; Chisholm A; Malouf R; Rowe R; Hollowell J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Mar; 17(1):103. PubMed ID: 28359258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The economic costs of intrapartum care in Tower Hamlets: A comparison between the cost of birth in a freestanding midwifery unit and hospital for women at low risk of obstetric complications.
Schroeder L; Patel N; Keeler M; Rocca-Ihenacho L; Macfarlane AJ
Midwifery; 2017 Feb; 45():28-35. PubMed ID: 27984773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A pathway to establish a publicly funded home birth program in Australia.
White C; Tarrant M; Hodges R; Wallace EM; Kumar A
Women Birth; 2020 Sep; 33(5):e420-e428. PubMed ID: 31668870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends and Characteristics of United States Out-of-Hospital Births 2004-2014: New Information on Risk Status and Access to Care.
MacDorman MF; Declercq E
Birth; 2016 Jun; 43(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 26991514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The national birth center study II: Research confirms low Cesarean rates and health care costs at birth centers.
Garvey M
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2013; (106):40, 68. PubMed ID: 23847895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of planned birth in a birth centre compared with alternative planned places of birth: results of the Dutch Birth Centre study.
Hitzert M; Hermus MM; Boesveld II; Franx A; van der Pal-de Bruin KK; Steegers EE; van den Akker-van Marle EM
BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016960. PubMed ID: 28893750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
