These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effects of age, parity, and device type on complications and discontinuation of intrauterine devices. Aoun J; Dines VA; Stovall DW; Mete M; Nelson CB; Gomez-Lobo V Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 123(3):585-592. PubMed ID: 24499755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intrauterine devices. Their role in family planning care. WHO Offset Publ; 1983; (75):1-53. PubMed ID: 6637075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Acceptability of IUDs is increasing. Finger WR; Barr D Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 12286082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Reasons for removal of intrauterine devices among women in general practice]. Kolding L; Majeed HG Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Mar; 175(13):884-6. PubMed ID: 23582897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A decade of intrauterine contraception: 1976 to 1986. Tatum HJ; Connell EB Fertil Steril; 1986 Aug; 46(2):173-92. PubMed ID: 3732523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-year efficacy and safety of a new 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Eisenberg DL; Schreiber CA; Turok DK; Teal SB; Westhoff CL; Creinin MD; Contraception; 2015 Jul; 92(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 25934164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception. Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical performance of intrauterine device TCu-380 A in Benghazi, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. Singh R; al-Amari M East Mediterr Health J; 2000; 6(5-6):1073-82. PubMed ID: 12197330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The intrauterine contraceptive device. Barwin BN; Tuttle S; Jolly EE Can Med Assoc J; 1978 Jan; 118(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 620385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Four years of experience with the TCu 380A intrauterine contraceptive device. Sivin I; Tatum HJ Fertil Steril; 1981 Aug; 36(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 7262334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 25601352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrauterine contraception for adolescents aged 14-18 years: a multicenter randomized pilot study of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared to the Copper T 380A. Godfrey EM; Memmel LM; Neustadt A; Shah M; Nicosia A; Moorthie M; Gilliam M Contraception; 2010 Feb; 81(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 20103449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive device: 5-year evaluation. Sellors JW Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Oct; 125(7):717-20. PubMed ID: 7326653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statement on intrauterine devices (IUDs). International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP IPPF Med Bull; 1987 Dec; 21(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 12268853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intrauterine contraception. Rao RP; Scommegna A Am Fam Physician; 1977 Nov; 16(5):177-85. PubMed ID: 920572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New developments in intrauterine devices. Farr G Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1991 Sep; 12(2):9. PubMed ID: 12284281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]