These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18508122)
21. The PCL: YV and recidivism in male and female juveniles: a follow-up into young adulthood. Vincent GM; Odgers CL; McCormick AV; Corrado RR Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 18534679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Brief checklists for assessing violence risk among patients discharged from acute psychiatric facilities: a preliminary study. Hartvig P; Alfarnes S; Ostberg B; Skjønberg M; Moger TA Nord J Psychiatry; 2006; 60(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16720517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The prediction and assessment of youth violence]. Zhang LL; Xie B Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 27(2):129-32, 138. PubMed ID: 21604453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An evaluation of the predictive validity of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI in justice-involved youth with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. McLachlan K; Gray AL; Roesch R; Douglas KS; Viljoen JL Psychol Assess; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1640-1651. PubMed ID: 29952591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predicting Reoffending Using the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY): A 5-Year Follow-Up Study of Male Juvenile Offenders in Hunan Province, China. Zhou J; Witt K; Cao X; Chen C; Wang X PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169251. PubMed ID: 28076443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth in a large community sample of young adult males and females: The TRAILS study. Sijtsema JJ; Kretschmer T; van Os T Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):669-77. PubMed ID: 25558967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) among a sample of Asian Canadian youth on probation. Li SMY; Viljoen JL; Christiansen AK; Muir NM Law Hum Behav; 2020 Dec; 44(6):485-501. PubMed ID: 33444063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does diagnosis affect the predictive accuracy of risk assessment tools for juvenile offenders: Conduct Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Khanna D; Shaw J; Dolan M; Lennox C J Adolesc; 2014 Oct; 37(7):1171-9. PubMed ID: 25173178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) to predict in-prison aggressive behavior in a Swiss offender population. Endrass J; Rossegger A; Frischknecht A; Noll T; Urbaniok F Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 17615429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Factors predicting continued violence into young adulthood. Scholte EM J Adolesc; 1999 Feb; 22(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 10066328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Juvenile sex offenders and institutional misconduct: the role of thought psychopathology. DeLisi M; Vaughn MG; Beaver KM; Wright JP; Hochstetler A; Kosloski AE; Drury AJ Crim Behav Ment Health; 2008; 18(5):292-305. PubMed ID: 19072890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Utility of TOCA-R scores during the elementary school years in identifying later violence among adolescent males. Petras H; Chilcoat HD; Leaf PJ; Ialongo NS; Kellam SG J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2004 Jan; 43(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 14691364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Psychopathy and violence in juvenile delinquents: what are the associated factors? Fritz MV; Wiklund G; Koposov RA; af Klinteberg B; Ruchkin VV Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 18502509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. de Vogel V; de Ruiter C; van Beek D; Mead G Law Hum Behav; 2004 Jun; 28(3):235-51. PubMed ID: 15264445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Concurrent and predictive validity of the psychopathy checklist: youth version across gender and ethnicity. Schmidt F; McKinnon L; Chattha HK; Brownlee K Psychol Assess; 2006 Dec; 18(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 17154760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing violence risk and psychopathy in juvenile and adult offenders: a survey of clinical practices. Viljoen JL; McLachlan K; Vincent GM Assessment; 2010 Sep; 17(3):377-95. PubMed ID: 20124429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating the validity of anger regulation problems, interpersonal style, and disturbed mental state for predicting inpatient violence. Doyle M; Dolan M Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(6):783-98. PubMed ID: 17171766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Are adolescent risk assessment tools sensitive to change? A framework and examination of the SAVRY and the YLS/CMI. Viljoen JL; Shaffer CS; Gray AL; Douglas KS Law Hum Behav; 2017 Jun; 41(3):244-257. PubMed ID: 28383982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Predictive Validity of Three Youth Violence Assessment Instruments: The SAVRY, VRS-YV, and SAPROF-YV. Koh LL; Day A; Klettke B; Daffern M; Chu CM Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2022 Feb; 66(2-3):168-185. PubMed ID: 33167725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reducing violence in serious juvenile offenders using intensive treatment. Caldwell MF; Van Rybroek GJ Int J Law Psychiatry; 2005; 28(6):622-36. PubMed ID: 16112731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]