131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18509274)
1. Fixation pattern in healthy subjects during microperimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Källmark FP; Ygge J
Med Sci Monit; 2008 Jun; 14(6):CR311-315. PubMed ID: 18509274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of fixation: results of fundus-controlled examination using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Rohrschneider K; Becker M; Kruse FE; Fendrich T; Völcker HE
Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jul; 4(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 7492929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Fundus-controlled microperimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope in macular diseases].
Schneider U; Kuck H; Inhoffen W; Kreissig I
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 Sep; 203(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 8264213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential diagnosis of macular breaks by microperimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Kakehashi A; Ishiko S; Konno S; Akiba J; Yoshida A
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1996; 40(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 8739509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Kinetic fundus controlled perimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope].
Rohrschneider K; Becker M; Fendrich T; Völcker HE
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Aug; 207(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 7474772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fixation stability: a comparison between the Nidek MP-1 and the Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope in persons with and without diabetic maculopathy.
Dunbar HM; Crossland MD; Rubin GS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Aug; 51(8):4346-50. PubMed ID: 20335616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry to detect visual impairment caused by macular photocoagulation.
Ishiko S; Ogasawara H; Yoshida A; Hanada K
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 1998 Feb; 29(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 9507251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relative scotomata in the "normal" eye of functionally amblyopic patients. A scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) micreperimetric study.
Johnson DA
Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2007; 22(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 17417965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Assessment of the macula function by static perimetry, microperimetry and rarebit perimetry in patients suffering from dry age related macular degeneration].
Nowomiejska K; Oleszczuk A; Zubilewicz A; Krukowski J; Mańkowska A; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z
Klin Oczna; 2007; 109(4-6):131-4. PubMed ID: 17725269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microperimetry--comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope--fundus perimetry.
Rohrschneider K; Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 15672526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vision restoration therapy (VRT) efficacy as assessed by comparative perimetric analysis and subjective questionnaires.
Sabel BA; Kenkel S; Kasten E
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2004; 22(6):399-420. PubMed ID: 15798360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Diagnosis of retinal diseases. Comparison between multifocal ERG and fundus perimetry - a case study].
Rohrschneider K; Bültmann S; Kiel R; Weimer P; Krastel H; Blankenagel A
Ophthalmologe; 2002 Sep; 99(9):695-702. PubMed ID: 12219258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Static microperimetry with the laser scanning ophthalmoscope].
Van de Velde FJ; Timberlake GT; Jalkh AE; Schepens CL
Ophtalmologie; 1990; 4(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 2250964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Values for macular perimetry using the MP-1 microperimeter in normal subjects.
Shah VA; Chalam KV
Ophthalmic Res; 2009; 41(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18849636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microperimetry in patients with central serous retinopathy.
Toonen F; Remky A; Janssen V; Wolf S; Reim M
Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Sep; 4(5):311-4. PubMed ID: 7496344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Eccentric fixation in Stargardt's disease assessed by Tübingen perimetry.
Messias A; Reinhard J; Velasco e Cruz AA; Dietz K; MacKeben M; Trauzettel-Klosinski S
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Dec; 48(12):5815-22. PubMed ID: 18055836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual field recovery after vision restoration therapy (VRT) is independent of eye movements: an eye tracker study.
Kasten E; Bunzenthal U; Sabel BA
Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 175(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16970999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scanning eye movements in homonymous hemianopia documented by scanning laser ophthalmoscope retinal perimetry.
Jamara RJ; Van De Velde F; Peli E
Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):495-504. PubMed ID: 12858085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry.
Varano M; Scassa C
Semin Ophthalmol; 1998 Dec; 13(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 9878671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Angioscotometry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Comparison of the effect of different wavelengths.
Remky A; Beausencourt E; Elsner AE
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Oct; 37(11):2350-5. PubMed ID: 8843920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
