These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18510239)
1. [To observe clinical effect of accommodative IOL on different age patients]. Li XM; Wang W Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 44(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 18510239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The clinical efficacy of accommodative intraocular lens and multifocal intraocular lens in pseudophakic after phacoemulsification]. Xu M; Li WS; Zhao YE; Wang QM Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 43(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 17459238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses. Küchle M; Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Gusek-Schneider GC; Martus P; Nguyen NX; Ophthalmology; 2004 Feb; 111(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 15019382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes. Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Gala KB Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 150(5):619-627.e1. PubMed ID: 20719298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Heatley CJ; Spalton DJ; Hancox J; Kumar A; Marshall J Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 140(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 15992754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. Dogru M; Honda R; Omoto M; Toda I; Fujishima H; Arai H; Matsuyama M; Nishijima S; Hida Y; Yagi Y; Tsubota K J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 15975453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Relationship between ciliary muscle contraction and the pseudo accommodation after the implantation of foldable intraocular lenses]. Dong Z; Wang NL; Zhu SQ; Wang J; Wang KJ; Jia LY; Zhao SQ; Wang XB Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 43(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 17459237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept. Alió JL; Ben-nun J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Plaza AB J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1671-8. PubMed ID: 19781458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation: prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses. Claoué C J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Oct; 30(10):2088-91. PubMed ID: 15474819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Two years experience with the new accommodative 1 CU intraocular lens]. Küchle M; Nguyen NX; Langenbucher A; Gusek-Schneider GC; Seitz B Ophthalmologe; 2002 Nov; 99(11):820-4. PubMed ID: 12430033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [First results of implantation of a new, potentially accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens]. Küchle M; Langenbucher A; Gusek-Schneider GC; Seitz B; Hanna KD Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Sep; 218(9):603-8. PubMed ID: 11590468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Matching and selection of two different types of pseudo-accommodative intraocular lens in two eyes after cataract phacoemulsification]. Tang X; Song H Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 44(12):1060-2. PubMed ID: 19187656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Validity of anterior chamber depth measurements for the evaluation of accommodation after implantation of an accommodative Humanoptics 1CU intraocular lens]. Auffarth GU; Martin M; Fuchs HA; Rabsilber TM; Becker KA; Schmack I Ophthalmologe; 2002 Nov; 99(11):815-9. PubMed ID: 12430032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Quality of vision in patients with aspherical diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation]. He YQ; Zhang CF; Wang KJ; Zhu SQ Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 89(31):2175-8. PubMed ID: 20058593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens. Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial. Harman FE; Maling S; Kampougeris G; Langan L; Khan I; Lee N; Bloom PA Ophthalmology; 2008 Jun; 115(6):993-1001.e2. PubMed ID: 18031818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Study of clinical application of aberration-free aspheric intraocular lens]. Tang XJ; Yao K; Xu W; Shentu XC; Chen PQ Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Apr; 46(4):328-31. PubMed ID: 20654060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Selection of accurate IOL formula in patients with cataract and high hyperopia]. Bai L; Zhang ZP; Yi GL; Wu WJ; Lin HT; Yan PS Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 44(12):1063-5. PubMed ID: 19187657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Miyake-Apple video analysis of movement patterns of an accommodative intraocular lens implant]. Auffarth GU; Schmidbauer J; Becker KA; Rabsilber TM; Apple DJ Ophthalmologe; 2002 Nov; 99(11):811-4. PubMed ID: 12430031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]