BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18510651)

  • 1. On comparison of mixture models for closed population capture-recapture studies.
    Xuan Mao C; You N
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):547-53. PubMed ID: 18510651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inference for clustered inhomogeneous spatial point processes.
    Henrys PA; Brown PE
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):423-30. PubMed ID: 18565167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On identifiability in capture-recapture models.
    Holzmann H; Munk A; Zucchini W
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):934-6; discussion 936-9. PubMed ID: 16984340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cluster detection based on spatial associations and iterated residuals in generalized linear mixed models.
    Zhang T; Lin G
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):353-60. PubMed ID: 18549423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating population size for a continuous time frailty model with covariates in a capture-recapture study.
    Xu Y; Liu L; You N; Pan H; Yip P
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):917-21. PubMed ID: 17403102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Related causal frameworks for surrogate outcomes.
    Joffe MM; Greene T
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):530-8. PubMed ID: 18759836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exact confidence bounds following adaptive group sequential tests.
    Brannath W; Mehta CR; Posch M
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):539-46. PubMed ID: 18759843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applications and extensions of Chao's moment estimator for the size of a closed population.
    Rivest LP; Baillargeon S
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):999-1006. PubMed ID: 17425635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The performance of mixture models in heterogeneous closed population capture-recapture.
    Pledger S
    Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):868-73; discussion 874-6. PubMed ID: 16135042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clustering in the presence of scatter.
    Maitra R; Ramler IP
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):341-52. PubMed ID: 18537949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Partly functional temporal process regression with semiparametric profile estimating functions.
    Yan J; Huang J
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):431-40. PubMed ID: 18547299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnosis of random-effect model misspecification in generalized linear mixed models for binary response.
    Huang X
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):361-8. PubMed ID: 18759837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The minimum capture proportion for reliable estimation in capture-recapture models.
    Xi L; Watson R; Yip PS
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):242-9. PubMed ID: 17680836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multilist population estimation with incomplete and partial stratification.
    Sutherland JM; Schwarz CJ; Rivest LP
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):910-6. PubMed ID: 17825020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A bayesian approach to the multistate Jolly-Seber capture-recapture model.
    Dupuis JA; Schwarz CJ
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1015-22. PubMed ID: 17501941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proportional hazards regression for cancer studies.
    Ghosh D
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 17573863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing marginal homogeneity against stochastic order in multivariate ordinal data.
    Klingenberg B; Solari A; Salmaso L; Pesarin F
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):452-62. PubMed ID: 18510649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A general class of recapture models based on the conditional capture probabilities.
    Farcomeni A
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 26355633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Joint modeling and analysis of longitudinal data with informative observation times.
    Liang Y; Lu W; Ying Z
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 18759841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semiparametric inference for surrogate endpoints with bivariate censored data.
    Ghosh D
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 17651457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.