BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18510722)

  • 1. Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data.
    Smith AB; Rush R; Fallowfield LJ; Velikova G; Sharpe M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 May; 8():33. PubMed ID: 18510722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using the Bootstrap Method to Evaluate the Critical Range of Misfit for Polytomous Rasch Fit Statistics.
    Seol H
    Psychol Rep; 2016 Jun; 118(3):937-56. PubMed ID: 27207735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample Size and Statistical Conclusions from Tests of Fit to the Rasch Model According to the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (Rumm) Program in Health Outcome Measurement.
    Hagell P; Westergren A
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(4):416-431. PubMed ID: 28009589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Rasch and confirmatory factor analysis of the general health questionnaire (GHQ)--12.
    Smith AB; Fallowfield LJ; Stark DP; Velikova G; Jenkins V
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2010 Apr; 8():45. PubMed ID: 20433690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Rasch analysis of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) among cancer survivors.
    Lambert SD; Pallant JF; Boyes AW; King MT; Britton B; Girgis A
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Jun; 25(2):379-90. PubMed ID: 23356678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
    He Q; Wheadon C
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stability of INFIT and OUTFIT Compared to Simulated Estimates in Applied Setting.
    Hodge KJ; Morgan GB
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(4):383-392. PubMed ID: 29252207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Examination of Sensitivity to Measurement Error in Rasch Residual-based Fit Statistics.
    Padgett RN; Morgan GB
    J Appl Meas; 2019; 20(4):354-366. PubMed ID: 31730543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Establishing the HLS-Q12 short version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire: latent trait analyses applying Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Finbråten HS; Wilde-Larsson B; Nordström G; Pettersen KS; Trollvik A; Guttersrud Ø
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):506. PubMed ID: 29954382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A rasch analysis of the statistical anxiety rating scale.
    Teman ED
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(4):414-34. PubMed ID: 24064581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of Rasch measurement to improve the Oswestry classification scheme.
    White LJ; Velozo CA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2002 Jun; 83(6):822-31. PubMed ID: 12048662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The family approach to assessing fit in Rasch measurement.
    Smith RM; Plackner C
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):424-37. PubMed ID: 19934529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model.
    Smith RM; Schumacker RE; Bush MJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 9661732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the Impact of Multidimensionality on Type I and Type II Error Rates using the Q-Index Item Fit Statistic for the Rasch Model.
    Estrada S
    J Appl Meas; 2020; 21(4):496-514. PubMed ID: 33989202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of confirmatory factor analysis and multidimensional Rasch models to investigate the dimensionality of test-taking motivation.
    Demars CE
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):179-96. PubMed ID: 23816595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Rasch and factor analysis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G).
    Smith AB; Wright P; Selby PJ; Velikova G
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2007 Apr; 5():19. PubMed ID: 17448239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accounting for Local Dependence with the Rasch Model: The Paradox of Information Increase.
    Andrich D
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(3):262-282. PubMed ID: 28027051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infit and Outfit: Interpreting Statistical Significance and Magnitude of Misfit in Conjunction.
    DeMars CE
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(2):163-177. PubMed ID: 28961152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring Aberrant Responses Using Person Fit and Person Response Functions.
    Walker AA; Engelhard G; Hedgpeth MW; Royal KD
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 28009584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.