992 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18511096)
1. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
Lou L
Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Local binocular fusion is involved in global binocular rivalry.
Takase S; Yukumatsu S; Bingushi K
Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(17):1798-803. PubMed ID: 18585751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision.
Baker DH; Meese TS; Summers RJ
Neuroscience; 2007 Apr; 146(1):435-48. PubMed ID: 17346895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain.
Moutoussis K; Keliris G; Kourtzi Z; Logothetis N
Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2231-43. PubMed ID: 15924938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peripheral fading with monocular and binocular viewing.
González EG; Weinstock M; Steinbach MJ
Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 17081583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of induced fixation disparity on binocular visual acuity.
Jenkins TC; Pickwell LD; Abd-Manan F
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):299-301. PubMed ID: 1454366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.
Brooks KR; Gillam BJ
Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 16054190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes.
O'Shea RP; Parker A; La Rooy D; Alais D
Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 19232529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stimulus flicker alters interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.
Knapen T; Paffen C; Kanai R; van Ee R
Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17083956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interactions between binocular rivalry and Gestalt formation.
de Weert CM; Snoeren PR; Koning A
Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2571-9. PubMed ID: 15893786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry.
Baker DH; Graf EW
Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(4):451-9. PubMed ID: 19124036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interocular interactions during acuity measurement in children and adults, and in adults with amblyopia.
Vedamurthy I; Suttle CM; Alexander J; Asper LJ
Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 17126872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binocular interactions in patients with age-related macular degeneration: acuity summation and rivalry.
Tarita-Nistor L; González EG; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ
Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2487-98. PubMed ID: 16545856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new look at binocular stereopsis.
Pizlo Z; Li Y; Francis G
Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2244-55. PubMed ID: 15924939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A psychophysical study of human binocular interactions in normal and amblyopic visual systems.
Vedamurthy I; Suttle CM; Alexander J; Asper LJ
Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1522-31. PubMed ID: 18501948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry.
Kamphuisen AP; van Wezel RJ; van Ee R
Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(9):1142-4. PubMed ID: 17360017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recovery from perceptual filling-in is gated by interocular matching.
Takase S; Yukumatsu S; Bingushi K
Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1909-15. PubMed ID: 19460398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of binocular stereopsis in monoptic depth perception.
Wilcox LM; Harris JM; McKee SP
Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2367-77. PubMed ID: 17651780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How does binocular rivalry emerge from cortical mechanisms of 3-D vision?
Grossberg S; Yazdanbakhsh A; Cao Y; Swaminathan G
Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2232-50. PubMed ID: 18640145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
