These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

549 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18511225)

  • 1. Sex determination from the radius and ulna in a modern South African sample.
    Barrier IL; L'Abbé EN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):85.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18511225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forearm bones and sexual variation in Turkish population.
    Uzün I; Işcan MY; Celbiş O
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2011 Dec; 32(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 21546820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations.
    Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of stature and determination of sex from radial and ulnar bone lengths in a Turkish corpse sample.
    Celbis O; Agritmis H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 May; 158(2-3):135-9. PubMed ID: 15990262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex determination from the distal part of the femur in a French contemporary population.
    Alunni-Perret V; Staccini P; Quatrehomme G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):113-7. PubMed ID: 17624707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Craniometric analysis of the modern Cretan population.
    Kranioti EF; Işcan MY; Michalodimitrakis M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Sep; 180(2-3):110.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18718728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracies of discriminant function equations for sex estimation using long bones of upper extremities.
    Bidmos MA; Mazengenya P
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 May; 135(3):1095-1102. PubMed ID: 33179172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual dimorphism of the humerus in contemporary Cretans--a population-specific study and a review of the literature*.
    Kranioti EF; Michalodimitrakis M
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Sep; 54(5):996-1000. PubMed ID: 19627412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An assessment of the accuracy of discriminant function equations for sex determination of the femur and tibia from a South African population.
    Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Mar; 206(1-3):212.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21251773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual dimorphism of the arm bones in a modern greek population.
    Charisi D; Eliopoulos C; Vanna V; Koilias CG; Manolis SK
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 20840296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metric sex determination from the pelvis in modern Greeks.
    Steyn M; Işcan MY
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):86.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18554832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex determination from the tibia: standards for contemporary Japan.
    Işcan MY; Yoshino M; Kato S
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 May; 39(3):785-92. PubMed ID: 8006623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mandibular ramus: an indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible.
    Saini V; Srivastava R; Rai RK; Shamal SN; Singh TB; Tripathi SK
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S13-6. PubMed ID: 20950321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex determination using the scapula in medieval skeletons from East Anatolia.
    Ozer I; Katayama K; Sağir M; Güleç E
    Coll Antropol; 2006 Jun; 30(2):415-9. PubMed ID: 16848161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex determination from the acetabulum: test of a possible non-population-specific discriminant function equation.
    Macaluso PJ
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2010 Aug; 17(6):348-51. PubMed ID: 20650427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex determination using metacarpal biometric data from the Athens Collection.
    Manolis SK; Eliopoulos C; Koilias CG; Fox SC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Dec; 193(1-3):130.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19850424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex assessment from carpals bones: discriminant function analysis in a contemporary Mexican sample.
    Mastrangelo P; De Luca S; Sánchez-Mejorada G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 209(1-3):196.e1-15. PubMed ID: 21592694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual dimorphism in ulna: an osteometric study from India.
    Srivastava R; Saini V; Rai RK; Pandey S; Singh TB; Tripathi SK; Pandey AK
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Sep; 58(5):1251-1256. PubMed ID: 23718819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex assessment from the carpals bones: discriminant function analysis in a 20th century Spanish sample.
    Mastrangelo P; De Luca S; Alemán I; Botella MC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Mar; 206(1-3):216.e1-10. PubMed ID: 21295424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metric determination of sex from the humerus in a Guatemalan forensic sample.
    Ríos Frutos L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):153-7. PubMed ID: 15567620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.