289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18511611)
1. The "future like ours" argument and human embryonic stem cell research.
Kuflik A
J Med Ethics; 2008 Jun; 34(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 18511611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate.
Di Nucci E
J Med Ethics; 2009 Oct; 35(10):651-2. PubMed ID: 19793949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A critique of "the best secular argument against abortion".
Strong C
J Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 34(10):727-31. PubMed ID: 18827103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Avoiding the Personhood Issue: Abortion, Identity, and Marquis's 'Future-Like-Ours' Argument.
Reitan E
Bioethics; 2016 May; 30(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 26424415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion: Strong's counterexamples fail.
Di Nucci E
J Med Ethics; 2009 May; 35(5):304-5; discussion 326-7. PubMed ID: 19407035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the 'future like ours' argument.
Strong C
J Med Ethics; 2012 Sep; 38(9):567-9. PubMed ID: 22505733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Alternate nuclear transfer is no alternative for embryonic stem cell research.
Fennel JA
Bioethics; 2008 Feb; 22(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 18251768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Boonin on the future-like-ours argument against abortion.
Galvão P
Bioethics; 2007 Jul; 21(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 17845456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Identity Objection to the future-like-ours argument.
Brill S
Bioethics; 2019 Feb; 33(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 30480832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human embryonic stem cell research: what's wrong with it?
Oderberg DS
Hum Life Rev; 2005; 31(4):21-33. PubMed ID: 16619431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The parenthood argument.
Simkulet W
Bioethics; 2018 Jan; 32(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 29171657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Embryonic stem cell research: one small step for science or one giant leap back for mankind?
Erwin CG
Univ Ill Law Rev; 2003; 2003(1):211-43. PubMed ID: 15568234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The future-like-ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism.
Sauchelli A
Bioethics; 2018 Mar; 32(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 29369389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A future like ours revisited.
Brown MT
J Med Ethics; 2002 Jun; 28(3):192-5; discussion 202. PubMed ID: 12042408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A regulatory argument against human embryonic stem cell research.
Napier S
J Med Philos; 2009 Oct; 34(5):496-508. PubMed ID: 19690326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stem cell terminology: practical, theological and ethical implications.
Shanner L
Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 15739320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stem cells from residual IVF-embryos - Continuation of life justifies isolation.
Bongaerts GP; Severijnen RS
Med Hypotheses; 2007; 69(3):478-80. PubMed ID: 17383111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis.
Christensen A
J Med Ethics; 2019 Jan; 45(1):22-25. PubMed ID: 30429204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Embryonic discourse: abortion, stem cells and cloning.
Dolgin JL
Issues Law Med; 2004; 19(3):203-61. PubMed ID: 15124522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Impairment Argument and Future-Like-Ours: A Problematic Dependence.
Bobier C
J Bioeth Inq; 2023 Sep; 20(3):353-357. PubMed ID: 37278912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
