These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18511623)

  • 1. Systematic reviews of empirical bioethics.
    Strech D; Synofzik M; Marckmann G
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jun; 34(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 18511623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews in bioethics: types, challenges, and value.
    McDougall R
    J Med Philos; 2014 Feb; 39(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 24334289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How factual do we want the facts? Criteria for a critical appraisal of empirical research for use in ethics.
    Strech D
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Apr; 36(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 20338933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The strengths and limitations of empirical bioethics.
    Strong KA; Lipworth W; Kerridge I
    J Law Med; 2010 Dec; 18(2):316-9. PubMed ID: 21355433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Why should we research in bioethics?].
    Horwitz N; Norero C
    Rev Med Chil; 2002 Aug; 130(8):911-5. PubMed ID: 12360802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The integrative review: updated methodology.
    Whittemore R; Knafl K
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Dec; 52(5):546-53. PubMed ID: 16268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical research in bioethical journals. A quantitative analysis.
    Borry P; Schotsmans P; Dierickx K
    J Med Ethics; 2006 Apr; 32(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 16574880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviews of empirical literature on bioethical topics: Results from a meta-review.
    Mertz M; Nobile H; Kahrass H
    Nurs Ethics; 2020 Jun; 27(4):960-978. PubMed ID: 32238039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What happened to our free bioethics search service? The terrible and premature death of BIOETHICSLINE.
    Plaza J
    Am J Bioeth; 2001; 1(4):W8. PubMed ID: 12861993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Appropriate methodologies for empirical bioethics: it's all relative.
    Ives J; Draper H
    Bioethics; 2009 May; 23(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 19338525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is it time for bioethics to go empirical?
    Herrera C
    Bioethics; 2008 Mar; 22(3):137-46. PubMed ID: 18257800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Creating clinically relevant knowledge from systematic reviews: the challenges of knowledge translation.
    Scott NA; Moga C; Barton P; Rashiq S; Schopflocher D; Taenzer P; Harstall C;
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):681-8. PubMed ID: 17683314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conducting systematic evidence reviews: core concepts and lessons learned.
    Brown PA; Harniss MK; Schomer KG; Feinberg M; Cullen NK; Johnson KL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S177-84. PubMed ID: 22840882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews.
    Mertz M; Strech D; Kahrass H
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):261. PubMed ID: 29258598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EMBASE search strategies achieved high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving methodologically sound systematic reviews.
    Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 60(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 17161751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Steps in reviewing literature.
    Summers S
    J Post Anesth Nurs; 1991 Jun; 6(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 2040993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.