These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18511623)

  • 21. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
    Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality of life in applied research: a review and analysis of empirical measures.
    Hughes C; Hwang B; Kim JH; Eisenman LT; Killian DJ
    Am J Ment Retard; 1995 May; 99(6):623-41. PubMed ID: 7632430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How to build a theory about empirical bioethics: acknowledging the limitations of empirical research.
    Fry CL
    Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):83-5. PubMed ID: 19998131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What 'empirical turn in bioethics'?
    Hurst S
    Bioethics; 2010 Oct; 24(8):439-44. PubMed ID: 19438442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Current empirical research in neonatal bioethics.
    Swinton CH; Lantos JD
    Acta Paediatr; 2010 Dec; 99(12):1773-81. PubMed ID: 20712838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Scleroderma Trial and Research group (EUSTAR) recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: methods of elaboration and results of systematic literature research.
    Avouac J; Kowal-Bielecka O; Landewe R; Chwiesko S; Miniati I; Czirjak L; Clements P; Denton C; Farge D; Fligelstone K; Földvari I; Furst DE; Müller-Ladner U; Seibold J; Silver RM; Takehara K; Toth BG; Tyndall A; Valentini G; van den Hoogen F; Wigley F; Zulian F; Matucci-Cerinic M;
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2009 May; 68(5):629-34. PubMed ID: 18957486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new prescription for empirical ethics research in pharmacy: a critical review of the literature.
    Cooper RJ; Bissell P; Wingfield J
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Feb; 33(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 17264193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies.
    Davies R; Ives J; Dunn M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 16():15. PubMed ID: 25885575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Realizing bioethics' goals in practice: ten ways "is" can help "ought".
    Solomon MZ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(4):40-7. PubMed ID: 16225305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Answering the 'so what?' question for empirical research in bioethics.
    Wynia MK
    Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):68-9. PubMed ID: 19998122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An introduction to an evidence-based approach to interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain.
    Manchikanti L; Singh V; Helm S; Schultz DM; Datta S; Hirsch JA;
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(4):E1-33. PubMed ID: 19668280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?
    Tsertsvadze A; Chen YF; Moher D; Sutcliffe P; McCarthy N
    Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 4():160. PubMed ID: 26563648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reviewing Literature in Bioethics Research: Increasing Rigour in Non-Systematic Reviews.
    McDougall R
    Bioethics; 2015 Sep; 29(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 25655982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits.
    Mahood Q; Van Eerd D; Irvin E
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 26052848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bioethics and conflicting ethical criteria.
    George M
    Synth Philos; 2002; 17(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 15739300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. For bioethics--the role of empirical research.
    Jacoby LH
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):58-9; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.
    Tricco AC; Pham B; Brehaut J; Tetroe J; Cappelli M; Hopewell S; Lavis JN; Berlin JA; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):617-623.e5. PubMed ID: 19162440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Treatment of dementia and cognitive impairment: what can we learn from the Cochrane Library.
    Bereczki D; Szatmári S
    J Neurol Sci; 2009 Aug; 283(1-2):207-10. PubMed ID: 19268303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Empirical ethics, context-sensitivity, and contextualism.
    Musschenga AW
    J Med Philos; 2005 Oct; 30(5):467-90. PubMed ID: 16282140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.