183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18512027)
21. [Freedom in research and responsibilities of scientists].
Mittelstrass J
Naturwissenschaften; 1990 Apr; 77(4):149-57. PubMed ID: 2342584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Why be my colleague's keeper? Moral justifications for peer review.
Cain J
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Oct; 5(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 11658232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Humans within nature. Hans Jonas and the imperative of responsibility.
Donnelley S
Infect Dis Clin North Am; 1995 Jun; 9(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 7673663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Professions, professional ethics, and bioengineering.
Wueste DE
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1997; 25(2):127-49. PubMed ID: 9315429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The social responsibilities of biological scientists.
Reiser SJ; Bulger RE
Sci Eng Ethics; 1997 Apr; 3(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 11657884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Experimentation with human subjects: a critique of the views of Hans Jonas.
Schafer A
J Med Ethics; 1983 Jun; 9(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 6876101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Commentary on "The social responsibilities of biological scientists" (S.J. Reiser and R.E. Bulger).
Salzberg AA
Sci Eng Ethics; 1997 Apr; 3(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 11657886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The ethics of psychological research. Part I. General ethical considerations: The moral role differentiation of experimental psychologists.
Bassford HA
Soc Sci Med F; 1981 Mar; 15F(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 11661962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Science ethics: a study of eminent scientists' professional values.
Prpić K
Scientometrics; 1998 Oct; 43(2):269-98. PubMed ID: 11660801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Commentary on "The social responsibilities of biological scientists" (S.J. Reiser and R.E. Bulger).
Beckwith J; Geller LN
Sci Eng Ethics; 1997 Apr; 3(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 11657885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Duties and decency.
Williams PC
Mt Sinai J Med; 1995 Mar; 62(2):98-101; discussion 116-23. PubMed ID: 7753090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Scientists and the integrity of research.
Alberts B; Shine K
Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5191):1660-1. PubMed ID: 7992048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Fraud and negligence in science.
Schmaus W
Conn Med; 1983 Mar; 47(3):155-8. PubMed ID: 6851550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Ethics and the frontline care worker: mapping the subject.
Kane RA
Generations; 1994; 18(3):71-4. PubMed ID: 11660097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The social context of workplace screening.
Murray TH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Oct; 14(5):21-3. PubMed ID: 6500915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Ethics and the Federation of Swiss Physicians].
Zimmermann K
Bull Schweiz Akad Med Wiss; 1980 Nov; 36(4-6):355-9. PubMed ID: 7470697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using Ethical Reasoning to Amplify the Reach and Resonance of Professional Codes of Conduct in Training Big Data Scientists.
Tractenberg RE; Russell AJ; Morgan GJ; FitzGerald KT; Collmann J; Vinsel L; Steinmann M; Dolling LM
Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1485-507. PubMed ID: 25431219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Working on a moral viewpoint].
Bout HJ
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1996 Nov; 121(22):656-7. PubMed ID: 8984724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Not my problem.
Pickering N
Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(1):45-6. PubMed ID: 8436491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Informatics and professional responsibility.
Gotterbarn D
Sci Eng Ethics; 2001 Apr; 7(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 11349362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
