306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18512495)
1. In-vitro testing of three totally supra-annular bileaflet mechanical valves: hydrodynamics in the Sheffield pulse duplicator.
Bottio T; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Mar; 17(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 18512495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves.
Bottio T; Caprili L; Casarotto D; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Sep; 128(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 15354108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of different mechanical prostheses suitable for replacement of the systemic atrioventricular valve in children.
Bottio T; Dal Lin C; Lika A; Rizzoli G; Tarzia V; Buratto E; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 143(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 21890150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The new St. Jude Medical regent mechanical heart valve: laboratory measurements of hydrodynamic performance.
Walker DK; Brendzel AM; Scotten LN
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):687-96. PubMed ID: 10616249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards-Duromedics, and Sorin-Bicarbon valves.
Reul H; van Son JA; Steinseifer U; Schmitz B; Schmidt A; Schmitz C; Rau G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Sep; 106(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 8361181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the new mechanical bileaflet Sorin Bicarbon valve prosthesis compared with St. Jude Medical].
Badano L; Carratino L; De Gaetano G; Piazza R; Calisi P; Passerone G; Lucatti A
G Ital Cardiol; 1994 Jun; 24(6):733-43. PubMed ID: 8088472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The changing spectrum of bioprostheses hydrodynamic performance: considerations on in-vitro tests.
Bottio T; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 Oct; 7(5):750-4. PubMed ID: 18628343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamics of high-performance bileaflet valves: comparison to simulated clinical Doppler measurements.
Dohmen G; Schmitz C; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Autschbach R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 16901053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized comparison of the Medtronic Advantage Supra and St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valves in the aortic position: is there an additional benefit of supra-annular valve positioning?
Guenzinger R; Eichinger WB; Hettich I; Bleiziffer S; Ruzicka D; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 136(2):462-71. PubMed ID: 18692658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transvalvular in vivo gradients of the new generation bileaflet heart valve prosthesis St. Jude Medical Regent in aortic position.
Südkamp M; Lercher AJ; Müller-Riemenschneider F; LaRosee K; Tossios P; Mehlhorn U; de Vivie ER
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Jun; 51(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 12833200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Results of aortic valve replacement with the supra-annular Sorin Bicarbon Overline prosthesis.
Reyes G; Badia S; Alvarez P; Kallmeyer C; Rodriguez S; Sarraj A; Bustamante J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 May; 21(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 22808838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro pulsatile flow hemodynamics of five mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses.
Walker PG; Yoganathan AP
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S113-23. PubMed ID: 1389270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aortic valve hydrodynamics: considerations on the absence of sinuses of Valsalva.
Bottio T; Buratto E; Dal Lin C; Lika A; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(6):718-23. PubMed ID: 23409351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of small-size Sorin Slimline and St. Jude HP heart valve prostheses.
Otero E; Pomar JL; Revuelta JM; Rufilanchas JJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Apr; 79(4):1284-90. PubMed ID: 15797063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Doppler assessment of mechanical aortic valve prostheses: effect of valve design and size of the aorta.
Mascherbauer J; Schima H; Maurer G; Baumgartner H
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 15473486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of the long-body On-X bileaflet heart valve.
Hwang NH; Reul H; Reinhard P
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 9793857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
