BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18513352)

  • 1. A comparison of five fMRI protocols for mapping speech comprehension systems.
    Binder JR; Swanson SJ; Hammeke TA; Sabsevitz DS
    Epilepsia; 2008 Dec; 49(12):1980-97. PubMed ID: 18513352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of task complexity on activation of language areas in a semantic decision fMRI protocol.
    Lopes TM; Yasuda CL; Campos BM; Balthazar MLF; Binder JR; Cendes F
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jan; 81():140-148. PubMed ID: 26721760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task-modulated activation and functional connectivity of the temporal and frontal areas during speech comprehension.
    Yue Q; Zhang L; Xu G; Shu H; Li P
    Neuroscience; 2013 May; 237():87-95. PubMed ID: 23357111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imagery in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study.
    Just MA; Newman SD; Keller TA; McEleney A; Carpenter PA
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jan; 21(1):112-24. PubMed ID: 14741648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recruitment of anterior and posterior structures in lexical-semantic processing: an fMRI study comparing implicit and explicit tasks.
    Ruff I; Blumstein SE; Myers EB; Hutchison E
    Brain Lang; 2008 Apr; 105(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18279947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech comprehension aided by multiple modalities: behavioural and neural interactions.
    McGettigan C; Faulkner A; Altarelli I; Obleser J; Baverstock H; Scott SK
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):762-76. PubMed ID: 22266262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What you say versus how you say it: Comparing sentence comprehension and emotional prosody processing using fMRI.
    Seydell-Greenwald A; Chambers CE; Ferrara K; Newport EL
    Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 209():116509. PubMed ID: 31899288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expectancy constraints in degraded speech modulate the language comprehension network.
    Obleser J; Kotz SA
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Mar; 20(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 19561061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bilateral capacity for speech sound processing in auditory comprehension: evidence from Wada procedures.
    Hickok G; Okada K; Barr W; Pa J; Rogalsky C; Donnelly K; Barde L; Grant A
    Brain Lang; 2008 Dec; 107(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 18976806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of domain-general frontal systems in language comprehension: evidence from dual-task interference and semantic ambiguity.
    Rodd JM; Johnsrude IS; Davis MH
    Brain Lang; 2010 Dec; 115(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 20709385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Language lateralization and the role of the fusiform gyrus in semantic processing in young children.
    Balsamo LM; Xu B; Gaillard WD
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(3):1306-14. PubMed ID: 16545581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-echo fMRI can detect activations in inferior temporal lobe during intelligible speech comprehension.
    Halai AD; Parkes LM; Welbourne SR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 122():214-21. PubMed ID: 26037055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment.
    Rüschemeyer SA; Zysset S; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):354-65. PubMed ID: 16427323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sign and speech: amodal commonality in left hemisphere dominance for comprehension of sentences.
    Sakai KL; Tatsuno Y; Suzuki K; Kimura H; Ichida Y
    Brain; 2005 Jun; 128(Pt 6):1407-17. PubMed ID: 15728651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Representational Similarity Mapping of Distributional Semantics in Left Inferior Frontal, Middle Temporal, and Motor Cortex.
    Carota F; Kriegeskorte N; Nili H; Pulvermüller F
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Jan; 27(1):294-309. PubMed ID: 28077514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments.
    Ben-Shachar M; Palti D; Grodzinsky Y
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1320-36. PubMed ID: 15050558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory selective attention to speech modulates activity in the visual word form area.
    Yoncheva YN; Zevin JD; Maurer U; McCandliss BD
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Mar; 20(3):622-32. PubMed ID: 19571269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phonetic detail and lateralization of reading-related inner speech and of auditory and somatosensory feedback processing during overt reading.
    Kell CA; Darquea M; Behrens M; Cordani L; Keller C; Fuchs S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Jan; 38(1):493-508. PubMed ID: 27622923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrostimulation mapping of comprehension of auditory and visual words.
    Roux FE; Miskin K; Durand JB; Sacko O; Réhault E; Tanova R; Démonet JF
    Cortex; 2015 Oct; 71():398-408. PubMed ID: 26332785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural processing associated with comprehension of an indirect reply during a scenario reading task.
    Shibata M; Abe J; Itoh H; Shimada K; Umeda S
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Nov; 49(13):3542-50. PubMed ID: 21930137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.