312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18513982)
1. Improvement of modelling capabilities for assessing urban contamination: the EMRAS Urban Remediation Working Group.
Thiessen KM; Batandjieva B; Andersson KG; Arkhipov A; Charnock TW; Gallay F; Gaschak S; Golikov V; Hwang WT; Kaiser JC; Kamboj S; Steiner M; Tomás J; Trifunovic D; Yu C; Zelmer RL; Zlobenko B
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1741-4. PubMed ID: 18513982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of environmental transfer models and assessment of the effectiveness of countermeasures using data on (131)I releases from Chernobyl.
Krajewski P; Ammann M; Bartusková M; Duffa C; Filistovic V; Homma T; Kanyár B; Malátová I; Nedveckaite T; Simon S; Vlasov O; Webbe-Wood D; Zvonova I
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1730-5. PubMed ID: 18541435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modelling of a large-scale urban contamination situation and remediation alternatives.
Thiessen KM; Arkhipov A; Batandjieva B; Charnock TW; Gaschak S; Golikov V; Hwang WT; Tomás J; Zlobenko B
J Environ Radioact; 2009 May; 100(5):413-21. PubMed ID: 19324477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modelling the long-term consequences of a hypothetical dispersal of radioactivity in an urban area including remediation alternatives.
Thiessen KM; Andersson KG; Batandjieva B; Cheng JJ; Hwang WT; Kaiser JC; Kamboj S; Steiner M; Tomás J; Trifunovic D; Yu C
J Environ Radioact; 2009 Jun; 100(6):445-55. PubMed ID: 19362757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An international comparison of models and approaches for the estimation of the radiological exposure of non-human biota.
Beresford NA; Balonov M; Beaugelin-Seiller K; Brown J; Copplestone D; Hingston JL; Horyna J; Hosseini A; Howard BJ; Kamboj S; Nedveckaite T; Olyslaegers G; Sazykina T; Vives I Batlle J; Yankovich TL; Yu C
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1745-9. PubMed ID: 18515123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Studies on the current 137Cs body burden of children in Belarus--can the dose be further reduced?
Hill P; Schläger M; Vogel V; Hille R; Nesterenko AV; Nesterenko VB
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):523-6. PubMed ID: 17314090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. International study on the validation of models for the environmental transfer of tritium and carbon-14.
Yankovich TL; Koarashi J; Kim SB; Davis PA
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1726-9. PubMed ID: 18667321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapporteur Report: ICNIRP international workshop on EMF dosimetry and biophysical aspects relevant to setting exposure guidelines.
Roy CR
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 17495669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach.
Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J
Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. IDEAS internal contamination database: a compilation of published internal contamination cases. A tool for the internal dosimetry community.
Hurtgen C; Andrasi A; Bailey M; Blanchardon E; Berkovski V; Castellani CM; Doerfel H; Jourdain JR; LeGuen B; Malatova I; Marsh J; Puncher M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):520-2. PubMed ID: 17012307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An operational approach for aircraft crew dosimetry: the SIEVERT system.
Bottollier-Depois JF; Blanchard P; Clairand I; Dessarps P; Fuller N; Lantos P; Saint-Lô D; Trompier F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):421-4. PubMed ID: 17711868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling of the EMRAS urban working group hypothetical scenario using the RESRAD-RDD methodology.
Kamboj S; Cheng JJ; Yu C; Domotor S; Wallo A
J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1012-8. PubMed ID: 19403213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The quantification of uncertainties in internal doses assessed from monitoring measurements.
Etherington G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17237184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical implications of procedures developed in IDEA project--comparison with traditional methods.
Andrasi A; Bouvier C; Brandl A; de Carlan L; Fischer H; Franck D; Höllriegl V; Li WB; Oeh U; Ritt J; Roth P; Schlagbauer M; Schmitzer Ch; Wahl W; Zombori P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):456-9. PubMed ID: 17314089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modelling remediation options for urban contamination situations.
Thiessen KM; Andersson KG; Charnock TW; Gallay F
J Environ Radioact; 2009 Jul; 100(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19427718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
van Rongen E; Saunders RD; van Deventer ET; Repacholi MH
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
Christ A
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uncertainties in determination of 131I activity in thyroid gland.
Ośko J; Golnik N; Pliszczynski T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):516-9. PubMed ID: 17309877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of the uncertainty in internal dose calculation for two contamination cases.
Blanchardon E; Molokanov A; Franck D; Kochetkov O; Panfilov A; Jourdain JR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):548-52. PubMed ID: 17237182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of the uncertainty in internal dose estimate resulting from biological stochastic variability of excretion.
Molokanov A; Blanchardon E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):561-4. PubMed ID: 17848381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
