These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18514172)

  • 1. The effect of attention on the illusory capture of motion in bimodal stimuli.
    Oruc I; Sinnett S; Bischof WF; Soto-Faraco S; Lock K; Kingstone A
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():200-8. PubMed ID: 18514172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influences of intra- and crossmodal grouping on visual and tactile Ternus apparent motion.
    Chen L; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():152-62. PubMed ID: 20659437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crossmodal interactions and multisensory integration in the perception of audio-visual motion -- a free-field study.
    Schmiedchen K; Freigang C; Nitsche I; Rübsamen R
    Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 1466():99-111. PubMed ID: 22617375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.
    Sanabria D; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):548-58. PubMed ID: 16132965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tactile-visual integration in the posterior parietal cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Nakashita S; Saito DN; Kochiyama T; Honda M; Tanabe HC; Sadato N
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Mar; 75(5):513-25. PubMed ID: 18355627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of automatic orienting of attention towards ipsilesional stimuli in non-visual (tactile and auditory) neglect: a critical review.
    Gainotti G
    Cortex; 2010 Feb; 46(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 19501350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory motion affects visual biological motion processing.
    Brooks A; van der Zwan R; Billard A; Petreska B; Clarke S; Blanke O
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):523-30. PubMed ID: 16504220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
    Beer AL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-modal dynamic capture: congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities.
    Soto-Faraco S; Spence C; Kingstone A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Apr; 30(2):330-45. PubMed ID: 15053692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When a high-intensity "distractor" is better then a low-intensity one: modeling the effect of an auditory or tactile nontarget stimulus on visual saccadic reaction time.
    Diederich A; Colonius H
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():219-30. PubMed ID: 18573240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of audio-visual integration sites in humans by application of electrophysiological criteria to the BOLD effect.
    Calvert GA; Hansen PC; Iversen SD; Brammer MJ
    Neuroimage; 2001 Aug; 14(2):427-38. PubMed ID: 11467916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and tactile integration in action comprehension and execution.
    Kritikos A; Brasch C
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():73-86. PubMed ID: 18579120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the role of visual perceptual grouping on the audiovisual integration of motion.
    Sanabria D; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(18):2745-9. PubMed ID: 15597046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.
    Leblanc E; Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
    Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating motion information across sensory modalities: the role of top-down factors.
    Soto-Faraco S; Kingstone A; Spence C
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 155():273-86. PubMed ID: 17027394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Capture of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion by moving and static sound.
    Chen L; Zhou X
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(4):369-89. PubMed ID: 21864460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
    Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.