BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18514918)

  • 41. Clinical assessment of attachment patterns and personality disorder in adolescents and adults.
    Westen D; Nakash O; Thomas C; Bradley R
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2006 Dec; 74(6):1065-85. PubMed ID: 17154736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The convergent, discriminant, and structural relationship of the DAPP-BQ and SNAP with the ICD-11, DSM-5, and FFM trait models.
    Crego C; Widiger TA
    Psychol Assess; 2020 Jan; 32(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 31328932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Quantifying clinical judgment in the assessment of adolescent psychopathology: Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Child Behavior Checklist for clinician report.
    Dutra L; Campbell L; Westen D
    J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):65-85. PubMed ID: 14692010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Personality assessment with the NEO-Five-Factor Inventory: the 30-Item-Short-Version (NEO-FFI-30)].
    Körner A; Geyer M; Roth M; Drapeau M; Schmutzer G; Albani C; Schumann S; Brähler E
    Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 2008 Jun; 58(6):238-45. PubMed ID: 17899495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Self-reported attachment, interpersonal aggression, and personality disorder in a prospective community sample of adolescents and adults.
    Crawford TN; Shaver PR; Cohen P; Pilkonis PA; Gillath O; Kasen S
    J Pers Disord; 2006 Aug; 20(4):331-51. PubMed ID: 16901258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The validity of the five-factor model prototypes for personality disorders in two clinical samples.
    Miller JD; Reynolds SK; Pilkonis PA
    Psychol Assess; 2004 Sep; 16(3):310-22. PubMed ID: 15456386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample.
    DeYoung CG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 91(6):1138-51. PubMed ID: 17144770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Empirical evidence for a four factor framework of personality disorder organization: multigroup confirmatory factor analysis of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III personality disorder scales across Belgian and Danish data samples.
    Rossi G; Elklit A; Simonsen E
    J Pers Disord; 2010 Feb; 24(1):128-50. PubMed ID: 20205502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Relationship between clinician assessment and self-assessment of personality disorders using the SWAP-200 and PAI.
    Bradley R; Hilsenroth M; Guarnaccia C; Westen D
    Psychol Assess; 2007 Jun; 19(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 17563203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of Pathological Traits in DSM-5 Personality Disorders By the DAPP-BQ: How Do These Traits Relate to the Six Personality Disorder Types of the Alternative Model?
    Berghuis H; Ingenhoven TJM; Heijden PTV; Rossi GMP; Schotte CKW
    J Pers Disord; 2019 Feb; 33(1):49-70. PubMed ID: 29120278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparison of the validity of the five-factor model (FFM) personality disorder prototypes. Using FFM self-report and interview measures.
    Miller JD; Bagby RM; Pilkonis PA
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Dec; 17(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 16393018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Psychometric properties and validity of the Dutch Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO-NL).
    Berghuis H; Kamphuis JH; Boedijn G; Verheul R
    Bull Menninger Clin; 2009; 73(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 19413469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Using the five-factor model to identify a new personality disorder domain: the case for experiential permeability.
    Piedmont RL; Sherman MF; Sherman NC; Dy-Liacco GS; Williams JE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1245-58. PubMed ID: 19469599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Personality disorders in substance abusers: validation of the DIP-Q through principal components factor analysis and canonical correlation analysis.
    Hesse M
    BMC Psychiatry; 2005 May; 5():24. PubMed ID: 15910688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Measuring personality functioning in older adults: construct validity of the Severity Indices of Personality Functioning - Short Form (SIPP-SF).
    Rossi G; Debast I; van Alphen SPJ
    Aging Ment Health; 2017 Jul; 21(7):703-711. PubMed ID: 26923265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The attitude to personality disorder questionnaire: psychometric properties and results.
    Bowers L; Allan T
    J Pers Disord; 2006 Jun; 20(3):281-93. PubMed ID: 16776556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [The French adaptation of the STAXI-2, C.D. Spielberger's State-trait anger expression inventory].
    Borteyrou X; Bruchon-Schweitzer M; Spielberger CD
    Encephale; 2008 Jun; 34(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 18558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Psychometric properties of a cognitive measure of personality disorders.
    Trull TJ; Goodwin AH; Schopp LH; Hillenbrand TL; Schuster T
    J Pers Assess; 1993 Dec; 61(3):536-46. PubMed ID: 8295115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Personality traits measured by the Swedish universities Scales of Personality: factor structure and position within the five-factor model in an Estonian sample.
    Aluoja A; Voogne H; Maron E; Gustavsson JP; Võhma U; Shlik J
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2009; 63(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 19034803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Factor structure and internal consistency of the Young Schema Questionnaire (Short Form) in Korean and Australian samples.
    Baranoff J; Oei TP; Cho SH; Kwon SM
    J Affect Disord; 2006 Jul; 93(1-3):133-40. PubMed ID: 16650482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.