BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18515023)

  • 1. The clinical application of potentials evoked from the peripheral auditory system.
    Miller CA; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Chi SL
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):184-97. PubMed ID: 18515023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency-specific electrocochleography indicates that presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of auditory neuropathy exist.
    McMahon CM; Patuzzi RB; Gibson WP; Sanli H
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18344874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
    Bahmer A; Peter O; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Rubinstein JT
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
    Runge-Samuelson CL; Drake S; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants.
    Cushing SL; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1787-91. PubMed ID: 17003731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory neuropathy: an update.
    Gibson WP; Sanli H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):102S-106S. PubMed ID: 17496659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains.
    Runge-Samuelson CL; Abbas PJ; Rubinstein JT; Miller CA; Robinson BK
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 15276671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrode independence in intraneural cochlear nerve stimulation.
    Badi AN; Owa AO; Shelton C; Normann RA
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 17195741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiologic effects following acute intracochlear direct current stimulation of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():68-71. PubMed ID: 7668761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
    Vischer M; Haenggeli A; Zhang J; Pelizzone M; Häusler R; Rouiller EM
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [An approach for proper recording of the unit discharge in auditory nerve and inferior colliculus].
    Pan T; Cao KL; Wang ZZ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Oct; 23(5):481-4. PubMed ID: 12905867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC
    Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):75-86. PubMed ID: 15567605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recovery function of electrically evoked compound action potential in implanted children with auditory neuropathy: preliminary results.
    Kim JR; Kim LS; Jeong SW; Kim JS; Chung SH
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Aug; 131(8):796-801. PubMed ID: 21466261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of temporal properties on compound action potentials in response to amplitude-modulated electric pulse trains in guinea pigs.
    Jeng FC; Abbas PJ; Hu N; Miller CA; Nourski KV; Robinson BK
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 19015019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct comparison between properties of adaptation of the auditory nerve and the ventral cochlear nucleus in response to repetitive clicks.
    Meyer K; Rouiller EM; Loquet G
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):144-55. PubMed ID: 17391881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.