260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18515023)
21. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):48-60. PubMed ID: 17157463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Delayed electrical stimulation and BDNF application following induced deafness in rats.
Song BN; Li YX; Han DM
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Feb; 129(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 18607918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival.
Prado-Guitierrez P; Fewster LM; Heasman JM; McKay CM; Shepherd RK
Hear Res; 2006 May; 215(1-2):47-55. PubMed ID: 16644157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials evoked by electric pulse trains.
Nourski KV; Abbas PJ; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Jeng FC
Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 15811706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of electrically evoked whole-nerve action potential and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds in nucleus CI24R cochlear implant recipients.
Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Brown CJ; Clay KS; Seyle K
J Am Acad Audiol; 2002 Sep; 13(8):416-27. PubMed ID: 12371659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical uses of electrically evoked auditory nerve and brainstem responses.
Brown CJ
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Oct; 11(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 14502071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Auditory brain stem potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of cochlear nuclei during central auditive implant setting].
Alegre M; Iriarte J; Manrique M; Huarte A; Vanaclocha V; Artieda J
Rev Neurol; 1999 Aug 1-15; 29(3):198-200. PubMed ID: 10797901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
Cohen LT
Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
Xi X; Hong MD; Han DY; Huang DL; Yang WY
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of cochlear traveling wave and neural adaptation on auditory brainstem responses.
Junius D; Dau T
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):53-67. PubMed ID: 15953515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Selective activation of cat primary auditory cortex by way of direct intraneural auditory nerve stimulation.
Kim SJ; Badi AN; Normann RA
Laryngoscope; 2007 Jun; 117(6):1053-62. PubMed ID: 17545868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Abnormal timing delays in auditory brainstem responses evoked by bilateral cochlear implant use in children.
Gordon KA; Valero J; van Hoesel R; Papsin BC
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 18223446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Programming cochlear implant stimulation levels in infants and children with a combination of objective measures.
Gordon K; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S28-32. PubMed ID: 15732379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses for lateral and medial placement of the Clarion HiFocus electrode.
Firszt JB; Wackym PA; Gaggl W; Burg LS; Reeder RM
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 12677114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15953524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Electrophysiologic and objective monitoring of the cochlear implant during surgery: implementation, audit and outcomes.
Mason S
Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S33-8. PubMed ID: 15732380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.
Botros A; van Dijk B; Killian M
Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16920343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An objective evaluation of retrocochlear function by means of CNT (Cochlear Nerve Tester).
Latkowski B; Gryczynski M; Jozwiak J; Krupa D; Makowski A; Komorowska A; Sidor W
Panminerva Med; 1993 Dec; 35(4):197-200. PubMed ID: 8202331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cochlear implantation results in patients with Kearns-Sayre syndrome.
Pijl S; Westerberg BD
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):472-5. PubMed ID: 18382375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: V. Effects of electrode surface area.
Huang CQ; Shepherd RK
Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 10913884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
