These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18515299)

  • 1. Driven to less distraction: rTMS of the right parietal cortex reduces attentional capture in visual search.
    Hodsoll J; Mevorach C; Humphreys GW
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jan; 19(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 18515299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.
    Lega C; Ferrante O; Marini F; Santandrea E; Cattaneo L; Chelazzi L
    J Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 39(38):7591-7603. PubMed ID: 31387915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Right posterior parietal cortex is involved in disengaging from threat: a 1-Hz rTMS study.
    Mulckhuyse M; Engelmann JB; Schutter DJLG; Roelofs K
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 12(11):1814-1822. PubMed ID: 29140532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reflexive and preparatory selection and suppression of salient information in the right and left posterior parietal cortex.
    Mevorach C; Humphreys GW; Shalev L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1204-14. PubMed ID: 18752407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facilitation of bottom-up feature detection following rTMS-interference of the right parietal cortex.
    Oliveri M; Zhaoping L; Mangano GR; Turriziani P; Smirni D; Cipolotti L
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):1003-10. PubMed ID: 20025892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polarity-dependent Effects of Biparietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Interplay between Target Location and Distractor Saliency in Visual Attention.
    Chechlacz M; Hansen PC; Geng JJ; Cazzoli D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 30(6):851-866. PubMed ID: 29393718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval.
    Ciaramelli E; Grady CL; Moscovitch M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):1828-51. PubMed ID: 18471837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulating the influence of recent trial history on attentional capture via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of right TPJ.
    Lega C; Santandrea E; Ferrante O; Serpe R; Dolci C; Baldini E; Cattaneo L; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2020 Dec; 133():149-160. PubMed ID: 33126008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.
    Won BY; Forloines M; Zhou Z; Geng JJ
    Cortex; 2020 Nov; 132():309-321. PubMed ID: 33010740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Salience determines attentional orienting in visual selection.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1051-1057. PubMed ID: 32757594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Right Parietal Cortex Disrupts Perception of Briefly Presented Stimuli.
    Howard CJ; Boulton H; Bedwell SA; Boatman CA; Roberts KL; Mitra S
    Perception; 2019 Apr; 48(4):346-355. PubMed ID: 30832537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual selection and posterior parietal cortex: effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on partial report analyzed by Bundesen's theory of visual attention.
    Hung J; Driver J; Walsh V
    J Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 25(42):9602-12. PubMed ID: 16237165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal dynamics of parietal cortex involvement in visual search.
    Rosenthal CR; Walsh V; Mannan SK; Anderson EJ; Hawken MB; Kennard C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):731-43. PubMed ID: 16150470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex.
    Mevorach C; Humphreys GW; Shalev L
    Nat Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 9(6):740-2. PubMed ID: 16699505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.