These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18515299)

  • 21. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons.
    Wolfe JM; Butcher SJ; Lee C; Hyle M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Apr; 29(2):483-502. PubMed ID: 12760630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.
    Theeuwes J; Burger R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Eimer M; Kiss M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 20436192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left parietal cortex facilitates visual search for a letter among its mirror images.
    Mangano GR; Oliveri M; Turriziani P; Smirni D; Zhaoping L; Cipolotti L
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():196-205. PubMed ID: 25744867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Age mediation of frontoparietal activation during visual feature search.
    Madden DJ; Parks EL; Davis SW; Diaz MT; Potter GG; Chou YH; Chen NK; Cabeza R
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2(0 2):262-74. PubMed ID: 25102420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons.
    Talsma D; Coe B; Munoz DP; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attenuating illusory binding with TMS of the right parietal cortex.
    Esterman M; Verstynen T; Robertson LC
    Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(3):1247-55. PubMed ID: 17336097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. rTMS-induced virtual lesion of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) alters the control of reflexive shifts of social attention triggered by pointing hands.
    Porciello G; Crostella F; Liuzza MT; Valentini E; Aglioti SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jul; 59():148-56. PubMed ID: 24813151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.
    Lamy D; Yashar A
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 28752665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impairments in top down attentional processes in right parietal patients: paradoxical functional facilitation in visual search.
    Mangano GR; Oliveri M; Turriziani P; Smirni D; Zhaoping L; Cipolotti L
    Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():74-82. PubMed ID: 24582796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interaction between value and perceptual salience in value-driven attentional capture.
    Wang L; Yu H; Zhou X
    J Vis; 2013 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23479463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interference with episodic memory retrieval following transcranial stimulation of the inferior but not the superior parietal lobule.
    Sestieri C; Capotosto P; Tosoni A; Luca Romani G; Corbetta M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Apr; 51(5):900-6. PubMed ID: 23391557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.
    Adam KCS; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(38):8007-8022. PubMed ID: 34330776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Chen X; Xu B; Chen Y; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14290. PubMed ID: 36946491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Eimer M; Kiss M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 20(8):1423-33. PubMed ID: 18303979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pre-stimulus activity predicts the winner of top-down vs. bottom-up attentional selection.
    Mazaheri A; DiQuattro NE; Bengson J; Geng JJ
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16243. PubMed ID: 21386896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Timing of spatial priming within the fronto-parietal attention network: A TMS study.
    Kehrer S; Kraft A; Koch SP; Kathmann N; Irlbacher K; Brandt SA
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():30-6. PubMed ID: 25448855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.