BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

929 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18515508)

  • 1. Episiotomy and increase in the risk of obstetric laceration in a subsequent vaginal delivery.
    Alperin M; Krohn MA; Parviainen K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1274-8. PubMed ID: 18515508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perineal lacerations during spontaneous vaginal delivery.
    Bodner K; Bodner-Adler B; Wagenbichler P; Kaider A; Leodolter S; Husslein P; Mayerhofer K
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001 Oct; 113(19):743-6. PubMed ID: 11715753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence and contributing factors of severe perineal damage following episiotomy-assisted vaginal delivery.
    Hsieh WC; Liang CC; Wu D; Chang SD; Chueh HY; Chao AS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 25510687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed.
    Sheiner E; Levy A; Walfisch A; Hallak M; Mazor M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Apr; 271(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 15024575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy.
    Hudelist G; Gelle'n J; Singer C; Ruecklinger E; Czerwenka K; Kandolf O; Keckstein J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):875-81. PubMed ID: 15746685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States.
    Fenner DE; Genberg B; Brahma P; Marek L; DeLancey JO
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Dec; 189(6):1543-9; discussion 1549-50. PubMed ID: 14710059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum.
    Kudish B; Blackwell S; Mcneeley SG; Bujold E; Kruger M; Hendrix SL; Sokol R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):749-54. PubMed ID: 16949408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk factors for the breakdown of perineal laceration repair after vaginal delivery.
    Williams MK; Chames MC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):755-9. PubMed ID: 16949409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Length of the second stage of labor as a predictor of perineal outcome after vaginal delivery.
    Sheiner E; Walfisch A; Hallak M; Harlev S; Mazor M; Shoham-Vardi I
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Feb; 51(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 16572912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in vaginal delivery, with an analysis of episiotomy types.
    Bodner-Adler B; Bodner K; Kaider A; Wagenbichler P; Leodolter S; Husslein P; Mayerhofer K
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):752-6. PubMed ID: 11547651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study.
    Simic M; Cnattingius S; Petersson G; Sandström A; Stephansson O
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Feb; 17(1):72. PubMed ID: 28222704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does midline episiotomy increase the risk of third- and fourth-degree lacerations in operative vaginal deliveries?
    Helwig JT; Thorp JM; Bowes WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):276-9. PubMed ID: 8336877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Episiotomy and increase in the risk of obstetric laceration in a subsequent vaginal delivery.
    Peleg D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):708; author reply 708. PubMed ID: 18757684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decreased anal sphincter lacerations associated with restrictive episiotomy use.
    Clemons JL; Towers GD; McClure GB; O'Boyle AL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1620-5. PubMed ID: 15902167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.
    Benavides L; Wu JM; Hundley AF; Ivester TS; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of spontaneous perineal stretching during delivery with perineal lacerations.
    Walfisch A; Hallak M; Harlev S; Mazor M; Shoham-Vardi I
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Jan; 50(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15730169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors for severe perineal tear: can we do better?
    Riskin-Mashiah S; O'Brian Smith E; Wilkins IA
    Am J Perinatol; 2002 Jul; 19(5):225-34. PubMed ID: 12152139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association between median episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in primiparous women.
    Labrecque M; Baillargeon L; Dallaire M; Tremblay A; Pinault JJ; Gingras S
    CMAJ; 1997 Mar; 156(6):797-802. PubMed ID: 9084384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of uterine fundal pressure maneuver at vaginal delivery and risk of severe perineal laceration.
    Matsuo K; Shiki Y; Yamasaki M; Shimoya K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 280(5):781-6. PubMed ID: 19263062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of mediolateral episiotomy during labour: analysis of risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears.
    Aukee P; Sundström H; Kairaluoma MV
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(7):856-60. PubMed ID: 16817086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.