113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18515509)
1. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of components of colposcopic grading.
Massad LS; Jeronimo J; Schiffman M;
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1279-84. PubMed ID: 18515509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of digitized cervical images.
Jeronimo J; Massad LS; Castle PE; Wacholder S; Schiffman M;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):833-40. PubMed ID: 17906017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The accuracy of colposcopic grading for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Massad LS; Jeronimo J; Katki HA; Schiffman M;
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jul; 13(3):137-44. PubMed ID: 19550210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial.
Ferris DG; Litaker M;
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 15870519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Bethesda Interobserver Reproducibility Study (BIRST): a web-based assessment of the Bethesda 2001 System for classifying cervical cytology.
Sherman ME; Dasgupta A; Schiffman M; Nayar R; Solomon D
Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 17186503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopic proficiency-disease spectrum in a single family practice colposcopists' clinic.
Brotzman GL; Schellhase KG
WMJ; 2004; 103(7):61-5. PubMed ID: 15696836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of cervical histologic results using an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index during ALTS.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 194(3):704-10. PubMed ID: 16522401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The technical performance and clinical feasibility of telecolposcopy.
Harper DM; Moncur MM; Harper WH; Burke GC; Rasmussen CA; Mumford MC
J Fam Pract; 2000 Jul; 49(7):623-7. PubMed ID: 10923572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colposcopy Quality Control: Establishing Colposcopy Criterion Standards for the National Cancer Institute ALTS Trial Using Cervigrams.
Ferris DG; Cox JT; Burke L; Litaker MS; Harper DM; Campion MJ; Greenberg MD; McShane L; Wun LM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1998 Oct; 2(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 25950212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Observer variability in the scoring of colpophotographs.
Sellors JW; Nieminen P; Vesterinen E; Paavonen J
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):1006-8. PubMed ID: 2234707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver agreement on interpreting hand drawings of colposcopy in women with borderline cytology to predict high-grade lesions.
Wensveen C; Kagie M; Nagelkerke N; Trimbos B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):123-6. PubMed ID: 16973255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An online quality assurance program for colposcopy in a population-based cervical screening setting in Italy: results on colposcopic impression.
Cristiani P; Costa S; Schincaglia P; Garutti P; de Bianchi PS; Naldoni C; Sideri M; Bucchi L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2014 Oct; 18(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 24886869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver variation in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens: comparison of grading systems.
McCluggage WG; Bharucha H; Caughley LM; Date A; Hamilton PW; Thornton CM; Walsh MY
J Clin Pathol; 1996 Oct; 49(10):833-5. PubMed ID: 8943751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interpretation of colposcopy in population-based cervical screening services in north-eastern Italy: an online interregional agreement study.
Garutti P; Cristiani P; Fantin GP; Sopracordevole F; Costa S; Schincaglia P; Ravaioli A; Sassoli de Bianchi P; Naldoni C; Ferretti S; Bucchi L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():64-69. PubMed ID: 27639133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement on Lesion Presence and Location at Colposcopy.
Lycke KD; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Jeronimo J; de Sanjose S; Egemen D; Del Pino M; Marcus J; Schiffman M; Hammer A
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2024 Jan; 28(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 37963327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and reliability of the endoscopic classification of chronic radiation-induced proctopathy using a novel grading method.
Chi KD; Ehrenpreis ED; Jani AB
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2005 Jan; 39(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15599209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of colposcopy in modern gynecology.
Dexeus S; Cararach M; Dexeus D
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(4):269-77. PubMed ID: 12214721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and diagnostic performance of smartphone colposcopy.
Aydın S; Karasu AFG; Maraşlı M; Bademler N; Kıran G; Dural HR
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Dec; 155(3):404-410. PubMed ID: 33630304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
Luesley D; Downey G
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical Cancer Screening in Cameroon: Interobserver Agreement on the Interpretation of Digital Cervicography Results.
Manga S; Parham G; Benjamin N; Nulah K; Sheldon LK; Welty E; Ogembo JG; Bradford L; Sando Z; Shields R; Welty T
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Oct; 19(4):288-94. PubMed ID: 26164295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
