These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Foundation of evidence-based decision making for health care managers-part II: meta-analysis and applying the evidence. Forrestal EJ Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2014; 33(3):230-44. PubMed ID: 25068878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quick Guide to Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. Koelemay MJ; Vermeulen H Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2016 Feb; 51(2):309. PubMed ID: 26712131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews. Bender R; Bunce C; Clarke M; Gates S; Lange S; Pace NL; Thorlund K J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 18687287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advantages of individual patient data analysis in systematic reviews. Tugwell P; Knottnerus JA J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):233-4. PubMed ID: 20152706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the new age of transparency. Honig PK Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Aug; 88(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 20648031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Epidemiology Workshop 12--Appraising a systematic review with meta-analysis. Yu IT; Tse SL Hong Kong Med J; 2013 Jun; 19(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 23732430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Viewpoint: taking into account risks of random errors when analysing multiple outcomes in systematic reviews. Jakobsen JC; Wetterslev J; Lange T; Gluud C Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 3(3):ED000111. PubMed ID: 27030037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: scientific rationale and interpretation. Ferreira González I; Urrútia G; Alonso-Coello P Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 64(8):688-96. PubMed ID: 21719182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others. PLoS Medicine Editors PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e147. PubMed ID: 17388685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: I. Getting started. Klassen TP; Jadad AR; Moher D Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1998 Jul; 152(7):700-4. PubMed ID: 9667544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. "Opinions differ significantly": Early experiences with meta-analysis and the people who made it possible. Cooper H Res Synth Methods; 2015 Sep; 6(3):272-6. PubMed ID: 26097209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making. Kranke P Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]