These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18517169)

  • 21. Indirect blood pressure measurement: a need to reassess.
    Anderson FD; Cunningham SG; Maloney JP
    Am J Crit Care; 1993 Jul; 2(4):272-7; quiz 278-9. PubMed ID: 8358473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intervention studies in nursing: is the effect due to the independent variable?
    Egan EC; Snyder M; Burns KR
    Nurs Outlook; 1992; 40(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 1495871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multilevel models in health outcomes research. Part I: Theory, design, and measurement.
    Lake ET
    Appl Nurs Res; 2006 Feb; 19(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 16455443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of hydrostatic leveling methods in invasive pressure monitoring.
    Rice WP; Fernandez EG; Jarog D; Jensen A
    Crit Care Nurse; 2000 Dec; 20(6):20, 22-30. PubMed ID: 11878256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retrospective chart reviews.
    Connelly LM
    Medsurg Nurs; 2008 Oct; 17(5):322-3. PubMed ID: 19051979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability.
    Higgins PA; Straub AJ
    Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A methodological review and evaluation of research on nurse-patient touch.
    Bottorff JL
    NLN Publ; 1991 Apr; (15-2392):303-43. PubMed ID: 2047224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The modified Morse Fall Scale.
    Morse JM
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2006 Jun; 12(3):174-5. PubMed ID: 16674785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validity and reliability.
    Kadir MM; Qureshi AF
    J Pak Med Assoc; 1994 Jun; 44(6):155-7. PubMed ID: 8089912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determining the relationship between invasive and noninvasive blood pressure values.
    Moniaci V; Kraus M
    Neonatal Netw; 1997 Feb; 16(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 9205280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The trained observer better predicts daytime ambulatory blood pressure measurement diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
    Verberk WJ; de Leeuw PW
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):57; author reply 57-9. PubMed ID: 17303990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of pulse pressure on the accuracy of wrist blood pressure measurement.
    Westhoff TH; Schmidt S; Meissner R; Zidek W; van der Giet M
    J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Jun; 23(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 19092843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A new approach to reproducibility assessment: clinical evaluation of SpaceLabs Medical oscillometric blood pressure monitor.
    Sun M; Tien J; Jones R; Ward R
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1996; 30(5):439-48. PubMed ID: 8909705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Behavioural Status Index (BSI) some preliminary reliability studies.
    Woods P; Reed V
    Int J Psychiatr Nurs Res; 1999 Oct; 5(2):554-61. PubMed ID: 10734848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a replication study.
    Gould D; Goldstone L; Kelly D; Gammon J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Mar; 41(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 14967190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What can we learn from interface pressure measurements?
    Fletcher J
    J Wound Care; 2001 Feb; 10(2):29-32. PubMed ID: 12964225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Errors in blood pressure determination].
    Bernauer U
    Med Klin; 1969 Aug; 64(31):1379-82. PubMed ID: 4895523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [How to diagnose hypertension in the elderly?].
    Vaisse B; Silhol F; Bouchlaghem K; Poggi L
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1999 Sep; 48(7):507-11. PubMed ID: 12555374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Classification bias in epidemiological studies].
    Zieliński A
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2008; 62(2):461-70. PubMed ID: 18807495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of a wound dressing using different research methods.
    Reynolds T; Russell L
    Br J Nurs; 2004 Jun; 13(11):S21-4. PubMed ID: 15228025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.