These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18519157)

  • 1. Response to paper "Systems thinking" by D. Cabrera et al.: conceptualizing systems thinking in evaluation.
    Nowell B
    Eval Program Plann; 2008 Aug; 31(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 18519157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response to paper "systems thinking" by D. Cabrera et al.: a tool for implementing DSRP in programme evaluation.
    Hummelbrunner R
    Eval Program Plann; 2008 Aug; 31(3):331-3. PubMed ID: 18519155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response to paper "Systems thinking" by D. Cabrera et al.: Is it systems thinking or just good practice in evaluation?
    Rogers PJ
    Eval Program Plann; 2008 Aug; 31(3):325-6. PubMed ID: 18541298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A response to paper "systems thinking" by D. Cabrera et al.: additional thoughts on systems thinking.
    Forrest J
    Eval Program Plann; 2008 Aug; 31(3):333-4. PubMed ID: 18538844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response to paper "Systems thinking" by D. Cabrera et al.: systems thinking from a critical systems perspective.
    Reynolds M
    Eval Program Plann; 2008 Aug; 31(3):323-5. PubMed ID: 18519156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response to paper "Systems thinking" by D. Cabrera et al.: systems thinking: an evaluation practitioner's perspective.
    Datta LE
    Eval Program Plann; 2008 Aug; 31(3):321-2. PubMed ID: 18538843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A response to paper "Systems thinking" by D. Cabrera et al.: next steps, a human service program system exemplar.
    Wasserman DL
    Eval Program Plann; 2008 Aug; 31(3):327-9. PubMed ID: 18550166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response to paper "Systems thinking" by D. Cabrera et al.: the unification of systems thinking: is there gold at the end of the rainbow?
    Midgley G
    Eval Program Plann; 2008 Aug; 31(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 18547644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinctions, systems, relationships, and perspectives (DSRP): a theory of thinking and of things.
    Cabrera D; Colosi L
    Eval Program Plann; 2008 Aug; 31(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 18554716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systems thinking.
    Cabrera D; Colosi L; Lobdell C
    Eval Program Plann; 2008 Aug; 31(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 18272224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of linear and systems thinking approaches for program evaluation illustrated using the Indiana Interdisciplinary GK-12.
    Dyehouse M; Bennett D; Harbor J; Childress A; Dark M
    Eval Program Plann; 2009 Aug; 32(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 19359040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interfacing theories of program with theories of evaluation for advancing evaluation practice: Reductionism, systems thinking, and pragmatic synthesis.
    Chen HT
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():109-118. PubMed ID: 27346429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Making sense of the emerging conversation in evaluation about systems thinking and complexity science.
    Gates EF
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():62-73. PubMed ID: 27591941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advancing systems thinking through the Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities evaluation.
    Sallis JF
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2015; 21 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S88-9. PubMed ID: 25828229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analyzing course objectives: assessing critical thinking in the pharmacy curriculum.
    Vuchetich PJ; Hamilton WR; Ahmad SO; Makoid MC
    J Allied Health; 2006; 35(4):e253-75. PubMed ID: 19759975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary trait analysis: student, course, and program assessment.
    Sheehe JB; Schoener L
    Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(3):114-7. PubMed ID: 19412050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Depicting the logic of three evaluation theories.
    Hansen M; Alkin MC; Wallace TL
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():34-43. PubMed ID: 22465702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The logic model as a framework for community program evaluations: the food literacy partners program.
    Kolasa K; Lackey C
    Fam Med; 2006; 38(10):690-1. PubMed ID: 17075735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agent-based modeling as a tool for program design and evaluation.
    Lawlor JA; McGirr S
    Eval Program Plann; 2017 Dec; 65():131-138. PubMed ID: 28865334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Causal inferences on the effectiveness of complex social programs: Navigating assumptions, sources of complexity and evaluation design challenges.
    Chatterji M
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():128-140. PubMed ID: 27473589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.