These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18519581)

  • 1. Word recognition materials for native speakers of Taiwan Mandarin.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Dukes A
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 17(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 18519581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometrically equivalent Mandarin bisyllabic speech discrimination materials spoken by male and female talkers.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Jennings LJ; Eggett DL; Buck H
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Jul; 44(7):379-90. PubMed ID: 16136788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of speech reception threshold materials for speakers of Taiwan Mandarin.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Slade KB
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Aug; 46(8):449-58. PubMed ID: 17654087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometrically equivalent Russian speech audiometry materials by male and female talkers.
    Harris RW; Nissen SL; Pola MG; McPherson DL; Tavartkiladze GA; Eggett DL
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):47-66. PubMed ID: 17365055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychometrically equivalent trisyllabic words for speech reception threshold testing in Mandarin.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Jennings LJ; Eggett DL; Buck H
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Jul; 44(7):391-9. PubMed ID: 16136789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of SC-10: A psychometrically equivalent Singapore Mandarin disyllabic word list for clinical speech audiometry use.
    Lee GJC; Lee SLH
    World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Jul; 7(3):247-256. PubMed ID: 34430833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance-intensity functions of Mandarin word recognition tests in noise: test dialect and listener language effects.
    Liu D; Shi LF
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 23800810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychometrically equivalent bisyllabic words for speech recognition threshold testing in Vietnamese.
    Harris RW; McPherson DL; Hanson CM; Eggett DL
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Aug; 56(8):525-537. PubMed ID: 28388853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychometrically equivalent spondaic words spoken by a female speaker.
    Wilson RH; Strouse A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Dec; 42(6):1336-46. PubMed ID: 10599616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychometrically Equivalent Fante Speech Recognition Threshold Materials by a Female Talker.
    Honu-Mensah CM; Offei YN; Owusu NAV; Anim-Sampong S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 May; 66(5):1842-1852. PubMed ID: 36989178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of the Mandarin Hearing in Noise Test (MHINT).
    Wong LL; Soli SD; Liu S; Han N; Huang MW
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):70S-74S. PubMed ID: 17496652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a mandarin monosyllable recognition test.
    Tsai KS; Tseng LH; Wu CJ; Young ST
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 19125031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Cates WB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of the Carrier Phrase on Word Recognition Performances by Younger and Older Listeners Using Two Stimulus Paradigms.
    Wilson RH; Sanchez VA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):412-441. PubMed ID: 31968207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychometric Characteristics of Spanish Monosyllabic, Bisyllabic, and Trisyllabic Words for Use in Word-Recognition Protocols.
    Carlo MA; Wilson RH; Villanueva-Reyes A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jul; 31(7):531-546. PubMed ID: 32485761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of Mandarin monosyllabic speech test materials in China.
    Han D; Wang S; Zhang H; Chen J; Jiang W; Mannell R; Newall P; Zhang L
    Int J Audiol; 2009 May; 48(5):300-11. PubMed ID: 19842805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The homogeneity with respect to intelligibility of recorded word-recognition materials.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):331-45. PubMed ID: 25879238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.