These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18519614)

  • 1. Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI).
    Garvin-Doxas K; Klymkowsky MW
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2008; 7(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 18519614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Six classroom exercises to teach natural selection to undergraduate biology students.
    Kalinowski ST; Leonard MJ; Andrews TM; Litt AR
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(3):483-93. PubMed ID: 24006396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bioliteracy and teaching efficacy: what biologists can learn from physicists.
    Klymkowsky MW; Garvin-Doxas K; Zeilik M
    Cell Biol Educ; 2003; 2(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 14506504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses.
    Andrews TM; Leonard MJ; Colgrove CA; Kalinowski ST
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(4):394-405. PubMed ID: 22135373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognizing student misconceptions through Ed's Tools and the Biology Concept Inventory.
    Klymkowsky MW; Garvin-Doxas K
    PLoS Biol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):e3. PubMed ID: 18177207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supplemental instruction in introductory biology I: enhancing the performance and retention of underrepresented minority students.
    Rath KA; Peterfreund AR; Xenos SP; Bayliss F; Carnal N
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 17785403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses.
    Preszler RW; Dawe A; Shuster CB; Shuster M
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 17339392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conceptual Characterization of Threshold Concepts in Student Explanations of Evolution by Natural Selection and Effects of Item Context.
    Göransson A; Orraryd D; Fiedler D; Tibell LAE
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2020 Mar; 19(1):ar1. PubMed ID: 31916913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages and challenges of using physics curricula as a model for reforming an undergraduate biology course.
    Donovan DA; Atkins LJ; Salter IY; Gallagher DJ; Kratz RF; Rousseau JV; Nelson GD
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013 Jun; 12(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 23737629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anticipation of Personal Genomics Data Enhances Interest and Learning Environment in Genomics and Molecular Biology Undergraduate Courses.
    Weber KS; Jensen JL; Johnson SM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133486. PubMed ID: 26241308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Student perspectives on curricular change: lessons from an undergraduate lower-division biology core.
    Casem ML
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2006; 5(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 17012192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How effective are simulated molecular-level experiments for teaching diffusion and osmosis?
    Meir E; Perry J; Stal D; Maruca S; Klopfer E
    Cell Biol Educ; 2005; 4(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 16220144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mixed results from a multiple regression analysis of supplemental instruction courses in introductory physics.
    Burkholder E; Salehi S; Wieman CE
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249086. PubMed ID: 33793607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Student interpretations of phylogenetic trees in an introductory biology course.
    Dees J; Momsen JL; Niemi J; Montplaisir L
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(4):666-76. PubMed ID: 25452489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and Validation of the Conceptual Assessment of Natural Selection (CANS).
    Kalinowski ST; Leonard MJ; Taper ML
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27856552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the effectiveness of the studio format in introductory undergraduate biology.
    Montelone BA; Rintoul DA; Williams LG
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2008; 7(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 18519615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What are they thinking? Automated analysis of student writing about acid-base chemistry in introductory biology.
    Haudek KC; Prevost LB; Moscarella RA; Merrill J; Urban-Lurain M
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2012; 11(3):283-93. PubMed ID: 22949425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Students' Views on Difficulties in Learning Histology.
    García M; Victory N; Navarro-Sempere A; Segovia Y
    Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Sep; 12(5):541-549. PubMed ID: 30378295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a meiosis concept inventory.
    Kalas P; O'Neill A; Pollock C; Birol G
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(4):655-64. PubMed ID: 24297292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of a Low-Cost, Graduate Student-Led Intervention on Study Habits and Performance in Introductory Biology.
    Hoskins TD; Gantz JD; Chaffee BR; Arlinghaus K; Wiebler J; Hughes M; Fernandes JJ
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 28747353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.