These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18519887)
1. Evaluation of the treatment tradeoff method in rectal cancer patients: is surgery preference related to outcome utilities? Bossema ER; Marijnen CA; Baas-Thijssen MC; van de Velde CJ; Stiggelbout AM Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):888-98. PubMed ID: 18519887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preferences for outcomes of treatment for rectal cancer: patient and clinician utilities and their application in an interactive computer-based decision aid. Masya LM; Young JM; Solomon MJ; Harrison JD; Dennis RJ; Salkeld GP Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1994-2002. PubMed ID: 19934920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patients' preferences for low rectal cancer surgery. Bossema E; Stiggelbout A; Baas-Thijssen M; van de Velde C; Marijnen C Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Jan; 34(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17905562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abdominoperineal resection or anterior resection for rectal cancer: patient preferences before and after treatment. Zolciak A; Bujko K; Kepka L; Oledzki J; Rutkowski A; Nowacki MP Colorectal Dis; 2006 Sep; 8(7):575-80. PubMed ID: 16919109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of continent catheterizable stomas for urinary and fecal incontinence: comparison among different tissue options. Castellan MA; Gosalbez R; Labbie A; Ibrahim E; Disandro M BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):1053-7. PubMed ID: 15839931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient and physician preferences for surgical and adjuvant treatment options for rectal cancer. Harrison JD; Solomon MJ; Young JM; Meagher A; Butow P; Salkeld G; Hruby G; Clarke S Arch Surg; 2008 Apr; 143(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 18427027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Chude GG; Rayate NV; Patris V; Koshariya M; Jagad R; Kawamoto J; Lygidakis NJ Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(86-87):1562-7. PubMed ID: 19102343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Which is the preference of choice either life with a stoma or evacuatory disorder following rectal cancer surgery? Matsuoka H; Masaki T; Kobayashi T; Sato K; Mori T; Sugiyama M; Atomi Y Hepatogastroenterology; 2011; 58(107-108):749-51. PubMed ID: 21830383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of life of patients operated on for low rectal cancer: impact of the type of surgery and patients' characteristics. Sideris L; Zenasni F; Vernerey D; Dauchy S; Lasser P; Pignon JP; Elias D; Di Palma M; Pocard M Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Dec; 48(12):2180-91. PubMed ID: 16228842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Invited commentary. Preferences for outcomes of treatment for rectal cancer: patient and clinician utilities and their application in an interactive computer-based decision aid. Ricciardi R Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Dec; 52(12):2002-3. PubMed ID: 19934921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Defunctioning stomas in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer prior to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Parnaby CN; Jenkins JT; Weston V; Wright DM; Sunderland GT Colorectal Dis; 2009 Jan; 11(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 18462220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptive Conjoint Analysis as individual preference assessment tool: feasibility through the internet and reliability of preferences. Pieterse AH; Berkers F; Baas-Thijssen MC; Marijnen CA; Stiggelbout AM Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Feb; 78(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 19581069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rectal augmentation: short- and mid-term evaluation of a novel procedure for severe fecal urgency with associated incontinence. Murphy J; Chan CL; Scott SM; Vasudevan SP; Lunniss PJ; Williams NS Ann Surg; 2008 Mar; 247(3):421-7. PubMed ID: 18376184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tan WS; Tang CL; Shi L; Eu KW Br J Surg; 2009 May; 96(5):462-72. PubMed ID: 19358171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of sphincter-saving operation for rectal cancer without protective stoma and pelvic drain, and risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Lohsiriwat V; Lohsiriwat D; Boonnuch W; Chinswangwatanakul V; Akaraviputh T; Riansuwan W; Lert-akyamanee N Dig Surg; 2008; 25(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 18577863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term quality of life in patients with rectal cancer: association with severe postoperative complications and presence of a stoma. Bloemen JG; Visschers RG; Truin W; Beets GL; Konsten JL Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Jul; 52(7):1251-8. PubMed ID: 19571701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing patients' utilities. Can the ends justify the means? Mulley AG Med Care; 1989 Mar; 27(3 Suppl):S269-81. PubMed ID: 2646492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Treatment of functional diseases after rectum anal surgery: effectiveness of rehabilitation of the pelvic pavement]. Corno F; Volpatto S; Borasi A; Barberis A; Mistrangelo M Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 19365320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preference assessment method affects decision-analytic recommendations: a prostate cancer treatment example. Elkin EB; Cowen ME; Cahill D; Steffel M; Kattan MW Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 15358999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision: a nonrandomized comparative prospective trial in a tertiary center in Mexico City. González QH; Rodríguez-Zentner HA; Moreno-Berber JM; Vergara-Fernández O; Tapia-Cid de León H; Jonguitud LA; Ramos R; Moreno-López JA Am Surg; 2009 Jan; 75(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 19213394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]