117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18519887)
1. Evaluation of the treatment tradeoff method in rectal cancer patients: is surgery preference related to outcome utilities?
Bossema ER; Marijnen CA; Baas-Thijssen MC; van de Velde CJ; Stiggelbout AM
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):888-98. PubMed ID: 18519887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preferences for outcomes of treatment for rectal cancer: patient and clinician utilities and their application in an interactive computer-based decision aid.
Masya LM; Young JM; Solomon MJ; Harrison JD; Dennis RJ; Salkeld GP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1994-2002. PubMed ID: 19934920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patients' preferences for low rectal cancer surgery.
Bossema E; Stiggelbout A; Baas-Thijssen M; van de Velde C; Marijnen C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Jan; 34(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17905562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abdominoperineal resection or anterior resection for rectal cancer: patient preferences before and after treatment.
Zolciak A; Bujko K; Kepka L; Oledzki J; Rutkowski A; Nowacki MP
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Sep; 8(7):575-80. PubMed ID: 16919109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of continent catheterizable stomas for urinary and fecal incontinence: comparison among different tissue options.
Castellan MA; Gosalbez R; Labbie A; Ibrahim E; Disandro M
BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):1053-7. PubMed ID: 15839931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient and physician preferences for surgical and adjuvant treatment options for rectal cancer.
Harrison JD; Solomon MJ; Young JM; Meagher A; Butow P; Salkeld G; Hruby G; Clarke S
Arch Surg; 2008 Apr; 143(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 18427027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study.
Chude GG; Rayate NV; Patris V; Koshariya M; Jagad R; Kawamoto J; Lygidakis NJ
Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(86-87):1562-7. PubMed ID: 19102343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Which is the preference of choice either life with a stoma or evacuatory disorder following rectal cancer surgery?
Matsuoka H; Masaki T; Kobayashi T; Sato K; Mori T; Sugiyama M; Atomi Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2011; 58(107-108):749-51. PubMed ID: 21830383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of life of patients operated on for low rectal cancer: impact of the type of surgery and patients' characteristics.
Sideris L; Zenasni F; Vernerey D; Dauchy S; Lasser P; Pignon JP; Elias D; Di Palma M; Pocard M
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Dec; 48(12):2180-91. PubMed ID: 16228842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Invited commentary. Preferences for outcomes of treatment for rectal cancer: patient and clinician utilities and their application in an interactive computer-based decision aid.
Ricciardi R
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Dec; 52(12):2002-3. PubMed ID: 19934921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Defunctioning stomas in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer prior to preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
Parnaby CN; Jenkins JT; Weston V; Wright DM; Sunderland GT
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Jan; 11(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 18462220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptive Conjoint Analysis as individual preference assessment tool: feasibility through the internet and reliability of preferences.
Pieterse AH; Berkers F; Baas-Thijssen MC; Marijnen CA; Stiggelbout AM
Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Feb; 78(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 19581069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rectal augmentation: short- and mid-term evaluation of a novel procedure for severe fecal urgency with associated incontinence.
Murphy J; Chan CL; Scott SM; Vasudevan SP; Lunniss PJ; Williams NS
Ann Surg; 2008 Mar; 247(3):421-7. PubMed ID: 18376184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Tan WS; Tang CL; Shi L; Eu KW
Br J Surg; 2009 May; 96(5):462-72. PubMed ID: 19358171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of sphincter-saving operation for rectal cancer without protective stoma and pelvic drain, and risk factors for anastomotic leakage.
Lohsiriwat V; Lohsiriwat D; Boonnuch W; Chinswangwatanakul V; Akaraviputh T; Riansuwan W; Lert-akyamanee N
Dig Surg; 2008; 25(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 18577863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term quality of life in patients with rectal cancer: association with severe postoperative complications and presence of a stoma.
Bloemen JG; Visschers RG; Truin W; Beets GL; Konsten JL
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Jul; 52(7):1251-8. PubMed ID: 19571701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing patients' utilities. Can the ends justify the means?
Mulley AG
Med Care; 1989 Mar; 27(3 Suppl):S269-81. PubMed ID: 2646492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Treatment of functional diseases after rectum anal surgery: effectiveness of rehabilitation of the pelvic pavement].
Corno F; Volpatto S; Borasi A; Barberis A; Mistrangelo M
Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 19365320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preference assessment method affects decision-analytic recommendations: a prostate cancer treatment example.
Elkin EB; Cowen ME; Cahill D; Steffel M; Kattan MW
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 15358999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision: a nonrandomized comparative prospective trial in a tertiary center in Mexico City.
González QH; Rodríguez-Zentner HA; Moreno-Berber JM; Vergara-Fernández O; Tapia-Cid de León H; Jonguitud LA; Ramos R; Moreno-López JA
Am Surg; 2009 Jan; 75(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 19213394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
