BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18520007)

  • 1. Stormflow-dominated loads of faecal pollution from an intensively dairy-farmed catchment.
    Davies-Colley R; Nagels J; Lydiard E
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1519-23. PubMed ID: 18520007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Faecal contamination over flood events in a pastoral agricultural stream in New Zealand.
    Nagels JW; Davies-Colley RJ; Donnison AM; Muirhead RW
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):45-52. PubMed ID: 12201126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential behaviour of Escherichia coli and Campylobacter spp. in a stream draining dairy pasture.
    Stott R; Davies-Colley R; Nagels J; Donnison A; Ross C; Muirhead R
    J Water Health; 2011 Mar; 9(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 21301115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monitoring coastal marine waters for spore-forming bacteria of faecal and soil origin to determine point from non-point source pollution.
    Fujioka RS
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(7):181-8. PubMed ID: 11724486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A model framework to assess the effect of dairy farms and wild fowl on microbial water quality during base-flow conditions.
    Muirhead RW; Elliott AH; Monaghan RM
    Water Res; 2011 Apr; 45(9):2863-74. PubMed ID: 21453952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overland flow delivery of faecal bacteria to a headwater pastoral stream.
    Collins R; Elliott S; Adams R
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 15960672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfer of Escherichia coli to water from drained and undrained grassland after grazing.
    Oliver DM; Heathwaite L; Haygarth PM; Clegg CD
    J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(3):918-25. PubMed ID: 15843655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Growing season surface water loading of fecal indicator organisms within a rural watershed.
    Sinclair A; Hebb D; Jamieson R; Gordon R; Benedict K; Fuller K; Stratton GW; Madani A
    Water Res; 2009 Mar; 43(5):1199-206. PubMed ID: 19117588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Establishing relative release kinetics of faecal indicator organisms from different faecal matrices.
    Hodgson CJ; Bulmer N; Chadwick DR; Oliver DM; Heathwaite AL; Fish RD; Winter M
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 49(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19422475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genotypic diversity of Escherichia coli in a dairy farm.
    Son I; Van Kessel JA; Karns JS
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2009 Sep; 6(7):837-47. PubMed ID: 19459756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling bacterial water quality in streams draining pastoral land.
    Collins R; Rutherford K
    Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(3):700-12. PubMed ID: 14723940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wildlife identified as major source of Escherichia coli in agriculturally dominated watersheds by BOX A1R-derived genetic fingerprints.
    Somarelli JA; Makarewicz JC; Sia R; Simon R
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 16551490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Faecal indicator pollution from a dairy farm in Ayrshire, Scotland: source apportionment, risk assessment and potential of mitigation measures.
    Vinten AJ; Sym G; Avdic K; Crawford C; Duncan A; Merrilees DW
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):997-1012. PubMed ID: 18001813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Escherichia coli loading at or near base flow in a mixed-use watershed.
    Gentry RW; McCarthy J; Layton A; McKay LD; Williams D; Koirala SR; Sayler GS
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(6):2244-9. PubMed ID: 17071895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Faecal bacteria yields in artificial flood events: quantifying in-stream stores.
    Muirhead RW; Davies-Colley RJ; Donnison AM; Nagels JW
    Water Res; 2004 Mar; 38(5):1215-24. PubMed ID: 14975655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Demonstration of methods to reduce E. coli runoff from dairy manure application sites.
    Meals DW; Braun DC
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1088-100. PubMed ID: 16738394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal variability of two contrasting transient pollution events in a pastoral stream.
    Yillia PT; Kreuzinger N; Mwetu KK
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):1053-63. PubMed ID: 20182086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in abundance of heterotrophic and coliform bacteria resident in stored water bodies in relation to incoming bacterial loads following rain events.
    Martin AR; Coombes PJ; Harrison TL; Hugh Dunstan R
    J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):255-60. PubMed ID: 20082020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Roadside ditches as conduits of fecal indicator organisms and sediment: implications for water quality management.
    Falbo K; Schneider RL; Buckley DH; Walter MT; Bergholz PW; Buchanan BP
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():1050-9. PubMed ID: 23933218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrated analysis of water quality parameters for cost-effective faecal pollution management in river catchments.
    Nnane DE; Ebdon JE; Taylor HD
    Water Res; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2235-46. PubMed ID: 21324505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.