582 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18520226)
1. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study.
Breitenstein S; Nocito A; Puhan M; Held U; Weber M; Clavien PA
Ann Surg; 2008 Jun; 247(6):987-93. PubMed ID: 18520226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paediatric robotic surgery in clinical practice: a cost analysis.
Anderberg M; Kockum CC; Arnbjornsson E
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Oct; 19(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 19830631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does robotic technology make minimally invasive cardiac surgery too expensive? A hospital cost analysis of robotic and conventional techniques.
Morgan JA; Thornton BA; Peacock JC; Hollingsworth KW; Smith CR; Oz MC; Argenziano M
J Card Surg; 2005; 20(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 15854086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Preliminary results at our Center].
Benincà G; Garrone C; Rebecchi F; Giaccone C; Morino M
Chir Ital; 2003; 55(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 12872566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outpatient versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single center clinical analysis.
Ji W; Ding K; Li LT; Wang D; Li N; Li JS
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2010 Feb; 9(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 20133231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Zhou HX; Guo YH; Yu XF; Bao SY; Liu JL; Zhang Y; Ren YG
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2006 Feb; 5(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 16481296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Laparoscopic versus mini-cholecystectomy: analysis of hospital costs and social costs in a prospective randomized study].
Secco GB; Cataletti M; Bonfante P; Baldi E; Davini MD; Biasotti B; Ravera G; Ferraris R
Chir Ital; 2002; 54(5):685-92. PubMed ID: 12469466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms.
Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP
Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitations.
Vidovszky TJ; Smith W; Ghosh J; Ali MR
J Surg Res; 2006 Dec; 136(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 17059837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.
Giger UF; Michel JM; Opitz I; Th Inderbitzin D; Kocher T; Krähenbühl L;
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 203(5):723-8. PubMed ID: 17084335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery minimizes esophageal perforation during Heller myotomy.
Melvin WS; Dundon JM; Talamini M; Horgan S
Surgery; 2005 Oct; 138(4):553-8; discussion 558-9. PubMed ID: 16269282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes.
Benway BM; Bhayani SB; Rogers CG; Dulabon LM; Patel MN; Lipkin M; Wang AJ; Stifelman MD
J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):866-72. PubMed ID: 19616229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy.
Wang GJ; Barocas DA; Raman JD; Scherr DS
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 17888044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption.
Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; Greve JW; Bouvy ND
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Feb; 17(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17318044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Goh PM; Lomanto D; So JB
Surg Endosc; 2002 Jan; 16(1):216-7. PubMed ID: 11961647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
