These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1852050)

  • 1. [The value of mammography in patients up to the age of 35].
    Farrés MT; Grabenwöger F; Dock W; Metz V; Salomonowitz E
    Rofo; 1991 May; 154(5):560-2. PubMed ID: 1852050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Stomper PC; Gelman RS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The value of ultrasound mammography in palpable breast masses.
    van Oord JC; van der Vliet AM; Thyn CJ; Mak B; Hoogeboom GJ
    Rofo; 1991 Jul; 155(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 1854938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Diagnosis of breast cancer by contact thermography (author's transl)].
    Kucera H; Kubista E
    Aktuelle Gerontol; 1979 Feb; 9(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 33573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Role of mammography in women under 35 years of age].
    Panzarola P; Bellucci MC
    Radiol Med; 1991; 81(1-2):62-4. PubMed ID: 2006338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography in women under age 30: is there clinical benefit?
    Williams SM; Kaplan PA; Petersen JC; Lieberman RP
    Radiology; 1986 Oct; 161(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 3763885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Value of mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Brünner N; Rasmussen SG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1978 Nov; 140(48):2984-6. PubMed ID: 726103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indications for breast imaging in women under age 35 years.
    Harris VJ; Jackson VP
    Radiology; 1989 Aug; 172(2):445-8. PubMed ID: 2664867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography of symptomatic breasts. A report on 1119 consecutive patients.
    Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG; Svinhufvud U
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1980; 69(2):48-53. PubMed ID: 7377735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indications and risk-benefit of mammography.
    Gold RH
    J Fam Pract; 1979 Jun; 8(6):1135-40. PubMed ID: 448297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use and abuse of mammography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Mahoney L; Csima A
    Can J Surg; 1983 May; 26(3):262-3, 265. PubMed ID: 6850440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The place of mammography following breast-conserving therapy of breast cancer].
    Schneider G; Steindorfer P; Fotter R
    Rofo; 1992 Jun; 156(6):582-6. PubMed ID: 1617180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography in women less than 40 years of age.
    Cohen MI; Mintzer RA; Matthies HJ; Bernstein JR
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Mar; 160(3):220-2. PubMed ID: 2983446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography.
    Varas X; Leborgne F; Leborgne JH
    Radiology; 1992 Aug; 184(2):409-14. PubMed ID: 1620838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The value of mammography in 1203 breast cancers (author's transl)].
    Guzzon A; Viganotti G; Bergonzi S; Coopmans de Yoldi G; Nessi R
    Radiol Med; 1981 Jun; 67(6):447-51. PubMed ID: 7268104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mammography and age (author's transl)].
    Gregl A; Heitmann D; Krack U; Pascoe M
    Rofo; 1977 Oct; 127(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 144648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No major impact of mammography screening on the age specific incidence rates of breast cancer in the Netherlands.
    Verkooijen HM; Fioretta G; van der Heiden M; Koot VC; Bouchardy C
    Int J Cancer; 2006 Dec; 119(12):2988; author reply 2989-90. PubMed ID: 17016822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recommending mammography screening beyond 80 years of age: a time for caution.
    Ciatto S
    Womens Health (Lond); 2008 Jul; 4(4):333-5. PubMed ID: 19072499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography.
    Carney PA; Abraham LA; Miglioretti DL; Yabroff KR; Sickles EA; Buist DS; Kasales CJ; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Dignan MB; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K;
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 17242246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.