576 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18522633)
21. Value of HPV-DNA test in women with cytological diagnosis of atypical glandular cells (AGC).
Zeferino LC; Rabelo-Santos SH; Villa LL; Sarian LO; Costa MC; do Amaral Westin MC; de Ângelo-Andrade LA; Derchain S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):160-4. PubMed ID: 21680079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cytologic and histologic review of atypical glandular cells (AGC) detected during cervical cytology screening.
Jeng CJ; Liang HS; Wang TY; Shen J; Yang YC; Tzeng CR
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(4):518-21. PubMed ID: 12911731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.
Nam K; Chung S; Kwak J; Cha S; Kim J; Jeon S; Bae D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 20885163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcomes of cervical liquid-based cytology suggesting a glandular abnormality.
Finall AI; Olafsdottir R
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):367-74. PubMed ID: 19929983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Follow-up of atypical glandular cells in cervical-endocervical smears.
Schindler S; Pooley RJ; De Frias DV; Yu GH; Bedrossian CW
Ann Diagn Pathol; 1998 Oct; 2(5):312-7. PubMed ID: 9845755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Discrepancy between Cytology and Histology in Cervical Cancer Screening: a Multicenter Retrospective Study (KGOG 1040).
Ouh YT; Park JJ; Kang M; Kim M; Song JY; Shin SJ; Shim SH; Yoo HJ; Lee M; Lee SJ; Shin W; Chong GO; Choi MC; Choi CH; Min KJ
J Korean Med Sci; 2021 Jun; 36(24):e164. PubMed ID: 34155836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinicopathological Characteristics of Atypical Glandular Cells Determined by Cervical Cytology in Japan: Survey of Gynecologic Oncology Data from the Obstetrical Gynecological Society of Kinki District, Japan.
Toyoda S; Kawaguchi R; Kobayashi H
Acta Cytol; 2019; 63(5):361-370. PubMed ID: 31048578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A retrospective review on atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) using the Bethesda 2001 classification.
Tam KF; Cheung AN; Liu KL; Ng TY; Pun TC; Chan YM; Wong LC; Ng AW; Ngan HY
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Dec; 91(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 14675684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Update on ASCCP consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical screening tests and cervical histology.
Apgar BS; Kittendorf AL; Bettcher CM; Wong J; Kaufman AJ
Am Fam Physician; 2009 Jul; 80(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 19621855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reclassification and analysis of clinical significance of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep using Bethesda 2001: Geneva experience.
Kumar N; Bongiovanni M; Molliet MJ; Pelte MF; Egger JF; Pache JC
Swiss Med Wkly; 2007 Nov; 137(45-46):635-41. PubMed ID: 18027109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cytology and curetting diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Bruehl FK; Dyhdalo KS; Hou Y; Clapacs E; Przybycin CG; Reynolds JP
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):556-562. PubMed ID: 32624383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Incidence and Clinical Significance of Atypical Glandular Cells of Undetermined Significance on Cervical Pap Smears.
Al-Rayyan E; Rashed M; Maaita M; Qudah S; Taso O; Haddadin W
Gulf J Oncolog; 2019 May; 1(30):52-56. PubMed ID: 31242982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Keratin 17 Is a Prognostic Biomarker in Endocervical Glandular Neoplasia.
Mockler D; Escobar-Hoyos LF; Akalin A; Romeiser J; Shroyer AL; Shroyer KR
Am J Clin Pathol; 2017 Sep; 148(3):264-273. PubMed ID: 28821199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A cytohistologic study of atypical glandular cells detected in cervical smears during cervical screening tests in Iran.
Mood NI; Eftekhar Z; Haratian A; Saeedi L; Rahimi-Moghaddam P; Yarandi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(1):257-61. PubMed ID: 16445641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. ASCUS and AGUS criteria. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Solomon D; Frable WJ; Vooijs GP; Wilbur DC; Amma NS; Collins RJ; Davey DD; Knight BK; Luff RD; Meisels A; Navin J; Rosenthal DL; Sauer T; Stoler M; Suprun HZ; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 9479320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Only a small fraction of high-grade cervical lesions are discovered after an interpretation of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance when using imager-assisted, liquid-based papanicolaou tests and the Bethesda 2001 system.
Khan KA; Smith DA; Thrall MJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Jul; 137(7):936-41. PubMed ID: 22994456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
