These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Eugenics and compulsory sterilization laws: providing redress for victims of a shameful era in United States history. Silver MG George Washington Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 72(4):862-92. PubMed ID: 16211742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A shared history of shame: Sweden's four-decade policy of forced sterilization and the eugenics movement in the United States. Hyatt S Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1998; 8(2):475-503. PubMed ID: 16200697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The constitution in a brave new world: a century of technological change and constitutional law. Merritt DJ Oregon Law Rev; 1990; 69(1):1-45. PubMed ID: 16044610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Va. apologizes to the victims of sterilizations. Branigin W Washington Post; 2002 May; ():B1, B9. PubMed ID: 17333594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Taking eugenics seriously: three generations of ??? are enough? Lombardo PA Fla State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 30(2):191-218. PubMed ID: 15083828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. From involuntary sterilization to genetic enhancement: the unsettled legacy of Buck v. Bell. Berry RM Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):401-48. PubMed ID: 12755089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical issues in health care: facing our responsibilities in 2010. Franzblau MJ Clin Dermatol; 2010; 28(1):112-4. PubMed ID: 20082960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Eugenic sterilization in America and North Carolina. Gardella JE N C Med J; 1995 Feb; 56(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 7898584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Choosing the genetic makeup of our children: our eugenics past--present, and future? Malinowski MJ Conn Law Rev; 2003; 36(1):125-224. PubMed ID: 15568257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Buck v. Bell: "felt necessities" v. fundamental values? Cynkar RJ Columbia Law Rev; 1981 Nov; 81(7):1418-61. PubMed ID: 10298419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Public and private eugenics: what can no longer be accomplished through overt government intervention may be largely achieved by private, indirect means. McEwen JE Genewatch; 1999 Jun; 12(3):1,3. PubMed ID: 11865875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetics, eugenics, and public policy. Smith GP South Ill Univ Law J; 1985; 1985(3):435-53. PubMed ID: 11649816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The dilemmas of German bioethics. Brown E New Atlantis; 2004; 5():37-53. PubMed ID: 15586957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Redressing forced sterilisation: the role of the medical profession. Gilmore S; Moffett L BJOG; 2020 Jul; 127(8):923-926. PubMed ID: 32150320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Eugenics, sex and the state: an afterword. Overy R Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2008 Jun; 39(2):270-2. PubMed ID: 18534359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]